This Article discusses the requirements and timing for these measures, including:
In this Article, "trademark" and "mark" refer to both trademarks and service marks.
US trademark rights derive from use of a mark, not its registration. However, registering a mark on the Principal Register grants a trademark owner certain rights and privileges beyond the right of exclusive use that attaches to trademark ownership. These include:
For more information on registering a mark in the US, see Practice Articles, Acquiring Trademark Rights and Registrations and Filing a Federal Trademark Application, US Trademark Application Flowchart: Use-Based Application, and US Trademark Application Flowchart: Intent-to-Use Application. A trademark owner who registers a mark with the USPTO must take affirmative steps to maintain that registration or risk forfeiting the registration benefits that may have taken many years and dollars to acquire. A trademark owner may also choose or need to make other filings to protect and optimize its rights.
To keep a federal trademark registration in effect, the trademark owner must periodically file the following documents, along with their required fees (see Practice Article, Acquiring Trademark Rights and Registrations: Box, USPTO Filing Fees):
With limited exceptions, these documents must be submitted through the USPTO's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) (37 C.F.R. § 2.23(a); see Article, Understanding the New USPTO Trademark E-Filing and Specimen Requirements: Exceptions for Paper Submissions). The USPTO provides TEAS forms for these and other filings relating to maintaining trademark registrations (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms). A free USPTO.gov account is required to access TEAS (see Legal Update, USPTO Updates TEAS Access to Require USPTO.gov Account). Failure to make these filings results in the loss or limitation of the benefits of registration. For example, a registration that is not timely renewed can expire (37 C.F.R. 2.182). (For more on trademark cancellations, see Practice Article, TTAB Oppositions and Cancellations: Grounds and Defenses.)
In 2019, the USPTO began requiring foreign-domiciled registrants to retain a qualified US-licensed attorney to represent them before the USPTO and handle any maintenance filings (37 C.F.R. § 2.11). An applicant or registrant is foreign-domiciled if it is either:
(37 C.F.R. §§ 2.2(b), (o), (p) and 2.11.)
To keep a federal trademark registration valid, its current owner must regularly file with the USPTO a Declaration (or Affidavit) of Continued Use or Excusable Nonuse under:
The trademark owner must include a fee (see Practice Article, Acquiring Trademark Rights and Registrations: Box, USPTO Filing Fees) and make the filing within one year before the end of each of the:
(15 U.S.C. §§ 1058(a) and 1141k(a); 37 C.F.R. § 2.160; Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) § 1604.) For an extra fee, the owner can take advantage of a six-month grace period following each deadline. Failure to timely file a Section 8 or 71 Declaration results in the automatic cancellation of the federal registration, though any acquired common law rights remain (37 C.F.R. § 2.160(a)(3)). The Declaration The Section 8 or 71 Declaration (or Affidavit) of Use must:
(37 C.F.R. §§ 2.161(a) and 7.37(a).) As with all submissions to the USPTO, the declaration must contain the following language:
(37 C.F.R. § 2.20.) TEAS Section 8 and 71 filing forms are available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms). If all statutory requirements are met, a Section 8 Declaration can be combined into one filing with:
TEAS combined Section 8 and 9 and combined Section 8 and 15 filing forms are available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms). Specimens of Use Unless the trademark owner is claiming excusable nonuse, each continued use filing must include at least one specimen per registration class showing actual use of the mark in commerce in connection with one of the goods or services in the class (see Excusable Nonuse). The specimen must also show an association between the registered mark and the goods or services covered by the registration. (37 C.F.R. § 2.56(a), (b).) Counsel generally submits copies, photos, or web page printouts of the specimen in JPG or PDF format and retains the original for the file. However, the reproduction must show enough of the specimen to identify the specimen, the mark, and the applicable goods or services. Web page printouts must also include the URL and access or print date. (37 C.F.R. § 2.56(c).) Acceptable specimens for a Section 8 or 71 Declaration, like those accompanying the initial application, may include:
(See generally 37 C.F.R. § 2.56 and TMEP §§ 904.03 and 1301.04.) For more examples of appropriate specimens for different goods and services, see Trademark Acceptable Specimen Chart. Initially, only one specimen per class of goods or services is typically required. If anything is unclear about the specimen, for example, if the specimen is of an unusual type or if counsel is uncertain about whether the mark in the specimen sufficiently matches the drawing in the registration, the registrant should:
This may help avoid an office action and the declaration's refusal (see Post-Registration Office Actions). The mark in any submitted specimen should be the same as the registered mark, but the two do not need to be stylistically identical (see TMEP 1604.13). For example, the USPTO may accept a specimen showing the same mark but in a slightly modernized style or with an altered background. The USPTO decides this on a case-by-case basis. If the mark in the specimen creates the same overall commercial impression as the registered mark, the USPTO should not reject the specimen as depicting a material alteration of the registered mark. (For a discussion of more significant changes, see Amendments.) USPTO Post Registration Proof of Use Audit Program The USPTO randomly audits registrants filing Section 8 or 71 Declarations for more than one good or service per class. Selected registrants receive office actions requesting additional proof of use of the registered marks for two additional goods or services in each audited class, in the form of any or all of the following:
The USPTO deletes goods or services for which an audited registrant cannot provide sufficient proof of use and cancels a registration in full if the registrant fails to either:
The USPTO has posted questions and answers about this program on its website. For more on the implementation of this program, see Legal Update, USPTO Publishes Final Rule Facilitating Verification of Certain Trademark Use Claims in Affidavits or Declarations. Nonuse Petitions Under the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 Pursuant to the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020, enacted on December 27, 2020, the USPTO is establishing new procedures to allow third parties to petition the USPTO Director to expunge or reexamine a trademark registration based on the registered mark's nonuse. Practical Law will update this resource as relevant developments arise. For more, see Legal Update, Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 Codifies Irreparable Harm Presumption and Establishes New Trademark Procedures. Excusable Nonuse If a registered mark is not in use due to special circumstances that excuse the nonuse, the mark's owner can fulfill its Section 8 or 71 obligation and keep the registration from being cancelled by filing a Declaration (or Affidavit) of Excusable Nonuse (37 C.F.R. § 2.161(a)(6)(ii)). To establish the necessary special circumstances, the trademark owner must list sufficient facts to demonstrate, for each class of the registration's goods or services not in use, that the nonuse is both:
(See TMEP § 1604.11.) Depending on the details, the following may be considered special circumstances:
(See TMEP § 1604.11.) Business strategy decisions and use of the mark on different good or services or in another form traditionally do not excuse the nonuse. The basic requirements for a nonuse declaration are the same as those for the use declaration, including that the filing must be accompanied by the specified fee (see Practice Article, Acquiring Trademark Rights and Registrations: Box, USPTO Filing Fees). However, instead of attesting to use, the trademark owner must set out for the goods or services in connection with which the registered mark is not in use:
(37 C.F.R. § 2.161(a)(6)(ii); TMEP § 1604.11.)
Most trademark registrations must be renewed every ten years. A written renewal application (Section 9 Application) must be:
(37 C.F.R. §§ 2.181(2), 2.182, and 2.183; TMEP § 1606.) For an extra fee, the trademark owner can take advantage of a six-month grace period following the deadline (TMEP § 1606.13(b)). The registration expires if a timely renewal application is not filed (37 C.F.R. § 2.182; TMEP § 1606.13(c)). The Section 9 renewal process does not apply to international registrations. International registration holders must renew their registrations with the International Bureau ( 37 C.F.R. § 7.41; TMEP § 1614). The Application The Section 9 Application must include:
(37 C.F.R. § 2.183.) The renewal application is usually combined with a Section 8 Declaration, due at the same time (see Declaration of Continued Use or Excusable Nonuse Under Section 8 or 71). TEAS Section 9 and combined Section 8 and 9 filing forms are available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms).
Because a lot is at stake, it is important for trademark owners to retain information pertaining to their registrations and related filings, and to keep it well organized. Certain simple, common-sense practices can help a trademark owner or its counsel maintain and enforce trademark registrations effectively. Deadlines If the trademark holder maintains a current email address and authorizes email communication with the USPTO, the USPTO sends courtesy emails reminding of maintenance filing deadlines. However, trademark owners should also maintain their own docket or deadline system and not rely solely on those reminders. For example, it is common for an owner of even a modest trademark portfolio or its counsel to maintain a database (either internally developed or purchased from a commercial provider) that:
Also, many companies establish pre-paid deposit accounts with the USPTO to ease the administrative burden associated with paying USPTO fees for registration maintenance. A deposit account application can be completed on the USPTO website. Recordkeeping Because evidence of a mark's use is essential to the maintenance of a trademark registration (as well as in any litigation involving the mark), it is critical that trademark owners collect and preserve relevant materials, such as:
Trademark owners should also maintain these records in a way that ensures their effectiveness by, for example:
Trademark owners should also maintain records to aid in enforcement efforts against third parties, for example, to establish a mark's:
For more, see Legal Update, The Right Stuff (Thorough Recordkeeping for Better Brand Protection). For resources that can be used to educate employees on how to use and protect company trademarks, see Standard Documents, Trademark Use and Protection Guidelines (Internal Distribution) and Trademark Use and Protection Training: Presentation Materials.
There are also optional filings a trademark owner can take advantage of to optimize and secure its rights under a US trademark registration.
Once a mark registered on the Principal Register has been in continuous use in commerce for at least five consecutive years after registration, the owner can file a Declaration (or Affidavit) of Incontestability (Section 15 Declaration or Affidavit). Incontestability status offers several advantages, including that third parties can no longer challenge:
(15 U.S.C. § 1065; TMEP § 1605.) Other than cost, which is minimal, there is no drawback to filing a Section 15 Declaration. A trademark owner can file a Section 15 Declaration separately or combined with a six-year Declaration of Continued Use (see Declaration of Continued Use or Excusable Nonuse Under Section 8 or 71), however the USPTO does not acknowledge a Section 15 Declaration unless a use declaration or affidavit is pending or has been accepted. The USPTO does not substantively review Section 15 filings. It merely confirms that the filing is facially sufficient and then updates the registration record to reflect receipt of the Section 15 Declaration. Therefore, whether the registration is actually incontestable is determined only if the mark is challenged in a court or TTAB proceeding. (TMEP § 1605.)
The Declaration The Section 15 Declaration (or Affidavit) must:
(37 C.F.R. § 2.167.) As with all submissions to the USPTO, the declaration in a Section 15 filing must contain the following language:
(37 C.F.R. § 2.20.) TEAS Section 15, combined Section 8 and 15, and combined Section 71 and 15 filing forms are available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms).
Corrections The trademark owner should promptly report to the USPTO any mistakes in the certificate of registration. The USPTO issues a certificate of correction or, at its discretion, a new registration certificate:
A USPTO error needing a material change to the registration to correct may require the registration to be cancelled as inadvertently issued and republished (TMEP § 1609.10(a)). The USPTO does not correct an applicant error that requires a material change to the registration (TMEP § 1609.10(b)). Amendments A trademark owner can, for a fee, amend its trademark registration if the amendment does not materially alter the mark (15 U.S.C. § 1057(e)). For example, a trademark owner may choose to:
However, any expansion of the scope of the protection under the registration or change in the commercial impression of the mark constitutes a material alteration that requires a new application (TMEP § 1609.02(a)). To decide whether a proposed amendment materially alters a registered mark, the USPTO compares the proposed amendment to the originally registered mark. If the change would have required re-publication of a published application to present the mark fairly for purposes of opposition, the amendment is a material alteration (TMEP § 1609.02(a)). An amendment generally is acceptable if the modified mark:
(TMEP § 1609.02(a).) TEAS request for amendment or correction of a registration certificate forms are available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms).
If the ownership of a registered mark changes, the assignee:
Although there is no legal requirement in the US to do so, an assignee should record the assignment and update the USPTO records because otherwise:
A TEAS assignment recordation form is available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms). For a form trademark assignment, see Standard Document, Trademark Assignment Agreement (Short-Form).
The USPTO responds to deficiencies in post-registration filings by issuing an office action. For example, the Examining Attorney may request a substitute filing if it finds unacceptable the wording of an affidavit or the sufficiency of a specimen. The USPTO may also issue an office action requesting additional proof to support a use filing (see USPTO Post Registration Proof of Use Audit Program). Typically, the trademark owner has six months to respond to a post-registration office action, just as with an office action in connection with the initial application. However, that time may actually be longer if the time period for the deficient filing has not expired by the office action response deadline (see TMEP §§ 1604.15, 1606.12). Any substitute specimen submission must include an attestation that the new specimen was in use during the relevant period. Therefore, the USPTO refuses an otherwise satisfactory substitute specimen if the trademark owner does not affirm that it was in use during the acceptable window for its initial submission. For office actions concerning required filings, such as Declarations of Continued Use and Renewal Applications, the USPTO cancels the registration if the owner does not respond to the office action within six months, unless time remains in the filing window or any applicable grace period. The Director of the USPTO may accept a late office action response, but only:
The unintentional delay standard for reviving abandoned applications after late office action responses does not apply to post-registration office actions. (TMEP § 1604.16.) For optional filings, like a Declaration of Incontestability, the USPTO merely disregards the challenged filing if it does not receive a timely office action response (37 C.F.R. § 2.163). If after an office action response the USPTO maintains the refusal, the trademark owner has six months to petition the Director of the USPTO to review the decision. Only once the Director issues a decision can the owner file for review on appeal or in a civil action. (37 C.F.R. §2.165.) A TEAS form for responding to a post-registration office action is available on the USPTO website (see Box, USPTO Electronic Forms).
With limited exceptions, all registration and maintenance documents must be filed electronically, through the USPTO's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and Electronic Trademark Assignment System (ETAS) (37 C.F.R. § 2.23(a); see Article, Understanding the New USPTO Trademark E-Filing and Specimen Requirements: Exceptions for Paper Submissions). A free USPTO.gov account is required to access TEAS (see Legal Update, USPTO Updates TEAS Access to Require USPTO.gov Account). The USPTO provides extensive information on the trademark process on its website, including at Trademarks Home. Users can send an email to TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or telephone the Trademark Assistance Center at (800) 786-9199 with any questions not answered on the site. Users can send questions about technical issues and the TEAS filing process by email to TEAS@uspto.gov. The email should include a telephone number for contact and, if existing, the relevant serial number or registration number. The USPTO provides links to commonly used forms on its website (see USPTO: Index of All TEAS Forms (log-in required to access forms)), including:
The USPTO also provides PDF versions of TEAS forms for filers to preview or to use when TEAS is unavailable and all requirements for paper filing are met (see Article, Understanding the New USPTO Trademark E-Filing and Specimen Requirements: Exceptions for Paper Submissions).
Ironically, as discussed in our 2021 alert, market studies have found that 1
Article
2023-11-15 15:46:32.768357[:10]
Article
2023-11-15 15:46:31.556401[:10]
Article
2023-11-15 15:46:30.996875[:10]
Stay Connected