Document type: Checklist Practice area: Corporate — Securities and Disclosure Jurisdiction: United States (federal and state) and European Union Last reviewed: 5 September 2026


How to use this checklist

Section 1 determines scope and should be completed before any other work. Sections 2 through 5 build the substance. Sections 6 through 8 are controls, review, and the recurring cycle.

Items marked [LIABILITY] are the ones that most often turn into a claim.


1. Obligation map

  • Public securities of any kind identified (equity, debt, continuing disclosure undertakings) — if any, all public statements are subject to the antifraud provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 78j and, for registered offerings, 15 U.S.C. § 77k. [LIABILITY]
  • Total revenue and California-attributable revenue determined against the California statutory thresholds — applies whether or not the company is public. [LIABILITY]
  • EU entities, branches, and EU turnover assessed against CSRD scoping, including non-EU parent phase-in.
  • Other national regimes assessed (United Kingdom, Japan, Australia, Canada, Singapore).
  • Credit agreements reviewed for sustainability-linked KPIs, definitions, and certification deadlines. [LIABILITY]
  • Customer contracts and supplier codes reviewed for reporting obligations, reduction commitments, and audit rights.
  • All live environmental marketing claims inventoried — packaging, website, sales materials, trade show collateral. [LIABILITY]
  • One-page obligation map produced listing regime, trigger, deliverable, first due date, and owner.
  • Map reviewed and refreshed annually.


2. Governance

  • A single accountable owner named for all sustainability disclosure — report, website, packaging, questionnaires, customer templates, credit certifications, and regulatory filings. [LIABILITY]
  • Board committee charter names sustainability disclosure oversight.
  • Committee reporting cadence set; minutes reflect substantive engagement.
  • Sustainability disclosure added to the disclosure committee agenda.
  • Data ownership assigned by category, each with a named owner, source system, and extraction method.
  • Legal review established as a publication gate for every public sustainability statement. [LIABILITY]
  • Escalation path defined for discovered errors and for claims that cannot be substantiated.

3. Greenhouse gas inventory — boundary and base year

  • Organizational boundary selected (equity share / financial control / operational control), with reasoning documented.
  • Boundary disclosed and applied consistently across all reporting.
  • Operational boundary listed: every facility, fleet, and emissions source.
  • Joint ventures, minority stakes, and leased assets addressed explicitly.
  • Base year selected and justified.
  • Base year recalculation policy written — threshold, trigger events (acquisition, divestiture, structural change, methodology change), approver, and disclosure requirement. [LIABILITY]
  • Policy written before the next transaction, not after.

4. Scope 1, 2, and 3

Scope 1

  • Stationary combustion: natural gas, propane, fuel oil, biomass — from invoices and fuel records.
  • Mobile combustion: owned and leased vehicles — from fuel cards, fleet systems, or mileage by class.
  • Process emissions from chemical or physical processes.
  • Fugitive emissions from refrigerants — from purchase and service records. Routinely omitted.

Scope 2

  • Location-based figure computed using regional grid factors.
  • Market-based figure computed using contractual instruments and residual mix.
  • Both figures reported. [LIABILITY]
  • Every contractual instrument documented: quantity, vintage, technology, geography, registry, and retirement evidence.
  • Certificates purchased but not retired excluded from the market-based figure.

Scope 3

  • All fifteen categories screened; significant categories identified and documented.
  • Method selected and documented per category (spend-based / average-data / supplier-specific / hybrid).
  • Supplier data program established for the largest categories, with template, deadline, follow-up, and procurement escalation.
  • Coverage percentage computed: proportion of the figure that is supplier-specific versus estimated.
  • Uncertainty range computed and disclosed. [LIABILITY]
  • The word "estimated" used wherever the figure was estimated — not "measured." [LIABILITY]

Emissions factors

  • Factor library maintained with source, version, publication date, and units for every factor.
  • Factor updates identified and their effect quantified separately from changes in activity.

5. Targets, transition plan, and offsets

  • Base year inventory established before any target announcement.
  • Levers identified with estimated contribution, cost, and timing.
  • Achievable reduction summed and compared to the proposed target.
  • The gap quantified and recorded. [LIABILITY]
  • Dependencies for closing the gap identified explicitly (grid decarbonization, future technology, offsets).
  • Capital plan confirmed consistent with the levers.
  • Board committee approval on a record that includes the analysis, not a summary.
  • Public target disclosure describes levers, contributions, gap, and dependencies — not only the number. [LIABILITY]
  • Interim milestones stated and tracked.
  • Transition plan describes actions, timing, capital, and accountability.
  • Offsets, if used, disclosed separately from gross emissions, with quantity, vintage, project type, registry, verification standard, and retirement evidence. [LIABILITY]
  • No unqualified "carbon neutral," "net zero," "climate positive," or "sustainable" claim at the product level. [LIABILITY]
  • Offset additionality, permanence, leakage, double counting, and vintage assessed and documented.

6. Risk assessment and securities disclosure

  • Financial materiality assessed under TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438 (1976) and, for contingencies, Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988).
  • Impact materiality assessed with a documented process if CSRD applies (double materiality).
  • Physical risk assessed facility by facility: hazards, exposure, business interruption, insurance availability and cost trend, mitigation.
  • Transition risk assessed: policy, technology, market, reputation.
  • Material climate matters reflected in risk factors, MD&A, business description, and legal proceedings under Regulation S-K, 17 C.F.R. Part 229.
  • Risk factors checked against realized events — no hypothetical framing of a risk that has already materialized. [LIABILITY]
  • MD&A addresses climate matters with material effect on results, liquidity, or capital resources.
  • Loss contingency accounting applied to climate-related litigation and enforcement.

7. Environmental marketing claims

  • Every live claim identified across packaging, website, sales materials, and social channels.
  • Substantiation file assembled for each claim before it runs, per the FTC Green Guides, 16 C.F.R. Part 260. [LIABILITY]
  • General claims ("green," "eco-friendly," "sustainable") qualified or removed.
  • Claim scope specified: product, package, or component.
  • Recyclability claims tested against actual municipal acceptance.
  • Recycled content, degradability, and compostability claims substantiated.
  • Renewable energy and renewable materials claims substantiated with retirement evidence.
  • "Free of" claims verified.
  • Competitor exposure under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 considered for each comparative or superiority claim. [LIABILITY]
  • State consumer protection exposure considered for consumer-facing claims.
  • New claim approval gate established with legal review.

8. Data controls

  • Version-controlled calculation workbook with locked formulas and a change log. [LIABILITY]
  • Documented methodology that a person who did not build the workbook can follow.
  • Every input traceable to a source document, retained.
  • Reconciliations run: fuel emissions to fuel expense; electricity to utility invoices and metered consumption; travel to booking system; waste to hauler invoices; procurement spend to general ledger.
  • Preparer and reviewer are different people; review documented.
  • Change management policy covering methodology, boundary, factor updates, base year recalculation, and restatement — with thresholds, approvals, and disclosure requirements.
  • Carbon accounting platform evaluated once the inventory stabilizes.

9. Assurance

  • Readiness assessment run one full year before assurance is required.
  • Readiness findings remediated and remediation documented.
  • Assurance provider engaged; scope and standard confirmed.
  • Limited versus reasonable assurance understood and correctly described in the disclosure.
  • Disclosure does not imply that limited assurance verifies accuracy or converts an estimate into a measurement. [LIABILITY]
  • Assurance findings treated as a work plan and tracked to closure.

10. Review before publication

  • Substantiation file complete: workbook, evidence, methodology, factor library, reconciliations, target analysis with gap, offset documentation, assurance report, and support for every claim.
  • Every quantitative statement traced to the workbook.
  • Every qualitative claim traced to support.
  • Every superlative and comparative challenged.
  • Every instance of "measured" verified.
  • Four recurring errors specifically checked: estimate described as measurement; unqualified neutrality claim; market-based Scope 2 without location-based; target without basis or gap. [LIABILITY]
  • All sustainability communications read side by side by one person for inconsistency: report, periodic filings under 15 U.S.C. § 78m, CSRD report, credit certification, customer templates, website.
  • Bridge schedules prepared explaining every difference between reported figures.
  • Disclosure committee sign-off recorded.
  • Substantiation file archived as of the publication date.

11. Recurring cycle

  • Data collection close and workbook preparation — Q1.
  • Reconciliations and reviewer sign-off — Q1.
  • Credit agreement KPI certification computed and delivered — per agreement. [LIABILITY]
  • Assurance engagement — Q2.
  • Materiality assessment refreshed — Q2.
  • Physical and transition risk refreshed — Q2.
  • Target progress computed; gap re-analyzed — Q2.
  • Report drafted and legally reviewed — Q3.
  • Website environmental claim sweep — Q3. [LIABILITY]
  • Board committee review — Q3.
  • Publication with sign-off recorded — Q3.
  • Customer templates and ratings questionnaires routed through legal review — Q4.
  • Questionnaire response log maintained and reconciled annually against the report.
  • Supplier data program cycle initiated — Q4.
  • Contractual deliverable calendar maintained — ongoing. [LIABILITY]

12. Incident response

  • Prior-year data error: materiality assessed; restatement policy applied; change described clearly; prior statements assessed for correction. A silently changed figure is worse than the original error.
  • Target expected to be missed: disclosure updated when the internal view changes, not at the deadline. [LIABILITY]
  • Marketing claim challenged: substantiation pulled; claim stopped immediately if support is inadequate.
  • Methodology change that improves the figure: change management policy applied; effect quantified separately and disclosed.
  • Acquisition or divestiture: base year recalculation applied and disclosed.
  • Litigation hold considered for inventory records, target analyses, and internal assessments.

13. Transaction diligence (buying or selling)

  • Existing inventory and methodology reviewed.
  • Assurance history and findings reviewed.
  • Live environmental marketing claims and their substantiation reviewed. [LIABILITY]
  • Contractual sustainability commitments identified, including credit agreement KPIs and customer obligations.
  • Regulatory filings reviewed for accuracy and completeness.
  • Pending or threatened greenwashing claims identified.
  • Sustainability representations and indemnities negotiated.
  • Post-closing base year recalculation planned.

Related documents


This checklist is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.