Summary. Everything a platform has to build, in the order it matters.
Phase 1 — Terms and formation
- Terms presented with clickwrap affirmative assent, not browsewrap.
- Record of which version each user accepted, and when.
- Change process defined, with notice and re-acceptance where material.
- Every commitment in the terms is one operations actually meets. No aspirational timelines.
- License from users broad enough to operate the service, no broader.
- User representations about rights in uploaded content, with indemnity.
- Prohibited conduct defined specifically enough to enforce.
- Termination rights and treatment of account data on termination.
- Dispute resolution — arbitration and class waiver if desired, with the formation record to support it.
- Mass arbitration considered in clause architecture.
- Governing law and venue.
- Privacy notice consistent with actual data practices.
Failure mode: promising 24-hour review with two part-time moderators.
Phase 2 — Copyright infrastructure
Mandatory: intellectual property is carved out of 47 U.S.C. § 230, so copyright runs through 17 U.S.C. § 512.
- DMCA agent designated with the Copyright Office and registration current. Verify the entry, not a calendar reminder.
- Agent contact information published on the service where users can find it.
- Notice intake accepting statutorily compliant notices.
- Expeditious removal on compliant notice.
- Notification to the user whose content was removed.
- Counter-notice process, with restoration after the statutory period unless suit is filed.
- Repeat infringer policy adopted AND reasonably implemented — strike tracking, defined thresholds, actual terminations.
- Termination records retained.
- Standard technical measures accommodated.
- No direct financial benefit from infringing activity the platform can control.
Failure mode: a written repeat infringer policy with zero terminations. That is not "reasonably implemented," and the safe harbor is lost.
Phase 3 — Community guidelines and enforcement
- Public community guidelines, plainly written, with examples.
- Internal enforcement guidance, more detailed, not published.
- Enforcement ladder: warning → removal → feature restriction → suspension → termination.
- Escalation paths for specialist, legal, and executive decisions.
- Repeat offender rules, distinct from the copyright policy.
- Consistency tested: sample decisions monthly, measure inter-reviewer agreement.
- Decision logging: policy applied, actor, timestamp, outcome, reasoning.
- Automated versus human decisions documented.
- Appeals process — and if offered, actually returning decisions.
- Moderator training and welfare provisions, including for outsourced review.
Phase 4 — Notice and action for non-copyright categories
Build intake, triage, target response time, decision record, user notification, and appeal for each:
- Trademark and counterfeiting
- Right of publicity and unauthorized likeness — the § 230 IP carve-out may reach state publicity claims
- Defamation (route and log; most platforms do not adjudicate truth)
- Privacy complaints
- Non-consensual intimate imagery — expedited path, hash matching, no court order required
- Impersonation, with parody distinguished
- Harassment and threats, with a safety escalation path
- Child safety — mandatory reporting, and preserve rather than delete
- Illegal and regulated goods
- Government and law enforcement requests
Phase 5 — Legal process
- Single monitored intake address for subpoenas and legal process.
- Validation checklist: subpoena, court order, warrant, or informal request — each authorizes different disclosures.
- Stored Communications Act analysis for content versus non-content.
- User notification where permitted and not barred by a nondisclosure order.
- If the terms promise notification, it happens.
- Objections raised for overbreadth, jurisdiction, or wrong process.
- Response within the required period, or a documented extension.
- Log maintained for transparency reporting.
- Unmasking requests: notify, let the user object, do not litigate on the user's behalf.
Phase 6 — Transparency instrumentation
Build the logging before the reporting obligation:
- Content actioned, by category and policy
- Actions taken, by type
- Automated versus human decisions
- Appeals received, granted, denied
- Median time to action
- Legal removal requests, by jurisdiction and type
- Accounts terminated and reinstated
- Copyright notices received, actioned, counter-noticed
- Report producible on demand, even before required
Phase 7 — Design review
The product-defect claims plaintiffs use to plead around § 230.
- Intake forms reviewed against anti-discrimination law. Structured fields eliciting protected categories are the Roommates.Com problem — especially in housing, employment, lending, insurance, and credit.
- Free-text preferred over structured categories where the category could be protected.
- Recommendation and ranking objectives documented, with safety constraints applied and recorded.
- Features affecting minors reviewed: defaults, notifications, engagement mechanics, prolonged-use incentives.
- Age assurance approach documented, including its limitations.
- Safety features (block, mute, report) verified to work as described.
- A review gate: product changes in these categories get legal review before launch.
Phase 8 — Minors
- Determine whether the service is directed to children under 13 or has actual knowledge of such users.
- If so: verifiable parental consent, collection limits, and disclosures under 15 U.S.C. § 6501 and 16 C.F.R. Part 312.
- Age-appropriate design obligations for older minors in relevant jurisdictions: high-privacy defaults, profiling restrictions, limits on nudge techniques.
- Data protection impact assessment where required.
- Do not claim to exclude minors if the platform demonstrably has them.
Phase 9 — Marketplaces
- Seller verification for high-volume sellers.
- Seller contact information disclosed to consumers.
- Prohibited items list mapped to underlying regulations, updated as they change.
- Product safety and recall monitoring for regulated categories.
- Assess whether operational control makes the platform a "seller" for product liability — fulfillment, pricing, and holding out, not listings.
- Counterfeit program with verified brand accounts and seller-level action.
Phase 10 — Platform's own speech
- Safety page accurate. (Unprotected by § 230; within 15 U.S.C. § 45.)
- Marketing claims about moderation, verification, and safety verified against practice.
- Advertiser-facing claims about reach, viewability, and brand safety supportable.
- Help center descriptions match actual process.
- Creator program terms formulaic rather than editorial — commissioning specific content moves toward being a content provider.
- Endorsement disclosure required and monitored under 16 C.F.R. Part 255.
Phase 11 — Incident response
- Who decides, who is notified, what is preserved, who communicates externally.
- Preservation trigger, especially for child safety and threat categories.
- Law enforcement referral standard and named on-call decision maker.
- Regulator and press communication owner.
- Post-incident review with findings assigned to owners.
Phase 12 — Annual review
- DMCA agent registration verified.
- Repeat infringer terminations confirmed in the data.
- Terms compared line by line against actual process.
- Safety and marketing representations re-read as a regulator would.
- New intake fields reviewed.
- Product changelog compared against the design review log.
- Transparency report produced.
- Moderation consistency sampled.
- Appeals backlog checked.
- Subpoena log reviewed against standard.
- Prohibited items list updated.
- New jurisdictions assessed for obligations.
- Incident plan names and rotations current.
- Every finding assigned an owner and a date.
Phase 13 — Diligence package
Assemble before a financing or sale process starts:
- DMCA registration with current expiration
- Repeat infringer policy and termination data
- All historical terms versions with acceptance records
- Public and internal moderation policies
- Enforcement statistics and published transparency reports
- Complete legal-process log
- All regulatory inquiries, resolved and open
- Litigation history including pre-suit resolutions
- Design review log for minors-facing features
- Age assurance approach and minor-user data
- Creator and advertising program terms
- Marketplace seller verification practices and safety incidents
Related documents
- Section 230 and Platform Liability: What the Statute Actually Says and Where It Stops
- Running a Platform That Hosts User Content: A Practical Guide
- Platform Liability Toolkit: Terms of Service, Notice Procedures, and Litigation Defenses
- DMCA Safe Harbor Compliance Checklist: A Practical Checklist
- COPPA Children's Privacy Compliance Checklist: A Practical Checklist
- Website Tracking Compliance Checklist: A Practical Checklist
- Data Subject Rights Request Handling Checklist: A Practical Checklist
