Document type: Checklist Practice area: Business and Corporate — Mergers and Acquisitions Jurisdiction: United States (Delaware emphasis) Last reviewed: 5 September 2026
Work top to bottom. Mark each open point with an estimated dollar exposure; the list you finish with is the negotiation agenda, ranked.
Part 1 — Structure and price
- Confirm the structure: stock purchase, merger, asset purchase, or unit purchase — and that the tax analysis supports it.
- Confirm who the actual parties are, including any acquisition subsidiary and any guarantor.
- Confirm the purchase price definition and every component: cash, rollover equity, seller notes, earnout, assumed debt.
- Confirm the treatment of debt, cash, and transaction expenses in the price calculation.
- Confirm option and warrant treatment, and who bears the cost of cashing them out.
- Confirm the allocation among sellers and that the waterfall matches the charter and any stockholder agreement.
- Confirm the payment mechanics: paying agent, wire instructions, letters of transmittal, timing.
Working capital and other adjustments:
- Is the target derived from real historical data, normalized for seasonality?
- Is a sample calculation attached as an exhibit?
- Is the accounting hierarchy specified — exhibit methodologies, then historical practice, then GAAP?
- Are the estimated statement, final statement, and objection deadlines specified?
- Is the dispute mechanism an independent accountant acting as an expert and not as an arbitrator, deciding only disputed items, within the range of the parties' positions?
- Is the fee allocation proportional to the outcome?
- Is double recovery expressly barred — a matter in the adjustment cannot also be indemnified?
- Is there a true-up escrow or is the adjustment paid directly?
Part 2 — Representations
- Does the set match this business? Add industry-specific representations; delete inapplicable ones.
- Financial statements: prepared in accordance with GAAP, consistently applied, fairly presenting.
- Absence of undisclosed liabilities.
- Absence of certain changes since the balance sheet date.
- Material contracts: is the definition's threshold appropriate to the size of the business?
- Litigation, including threatened matters.
- Compliance with law and permits.
- Taxes.
- Employee benefits and ERISA.
- Labor and employment, including classification.
- Intellectual property: ownership, assignments, open source, licenses in and out.
- Data privacy and cybersecurity, including incidents.
- Environmental.
- Real and personal property, and title.
- Insurance.
- Customers and suppliers, and any concentration.
- Related-party transactions.
- Export controls, sanctions, and anti-corruption, if there are international operations.
- Brokers.
- Is there a 10b-5 catch-all representation? Buyers want it; sellers should trade for its removal.
Qualifiers — read them together:
- For each representation, list the qualifiers applied: materiality, knowledge, dollar threshold, time period.
- Is "Knowledge" defined by a named list of individuals? How many, and are they the right ones?
- Is it actual knowledge, or actual knowledge after reasonable inquiry?
- Are the dollar thresholds proportionate to the business?
- Ask for each representation: what would actually have to happen for this to be false? If the answer is "almost nothing could," the qualifiers have compounded.
The scrape:
- Is there a materiality scrape? Damages-only, double, or none?
- Are the definitional-materiality representations carved out (material contracts, and similar)?
Part 3 — Disclosure schedules
- Is every representation matched to a schedule, and every schedule to a representation?
- Does each schedule disclose facts, not document references?
- Are facts cross-referenced under every representation they qualify?
- Read the general disclosure provision: does cross-qualification require relevance to be apparent on the face of the disclosure, or merely "reasonably apparent"?
- Is over-disclosure a problem — do the schedules obscure the material items?
- Are the schedules dated and version-controlled?
- Is a signed, dated set retained for signing and for closing?
Update rights — the most consequential term in the schedules:
- May the seller update between signing and closing?
- Does an update cure a breach for indemnification purposes, or only inform the buyer?
- Does an update affect the bring-down condition and the buyer's walk right?
- Confirm the position is deliberate. A curative update transfers all interim risk to the buyer.
Part 4 — Covenants and closing conditions
- Interim operating covenant: is "ordinary course consistent with past practice" qualified appropriately, and are anticipated changes expressly permitted?
- The list of prohibited interim actions and the consent standard for each.
- Efforts standard for closing conditions: commercially reasonable, reasonable best, or best efforts.
- Regulatory covenants: who files, who pays, what remedies each party must accept.
- Exclusivity and non-solicitation during the interim period.
- Access and information rights.
- Confidentiality and announcement provisions.
- Post-closing covenants: non-compete, non-solicit, transition services, records access, further assurances, tax cooperation, D&O indemnification and tail insurance.
Conditions:
- Bring-down standard for representations: absolute, materiality-qualified, or MAE-qualified — and which representations get which.
- Covenant compliance in all material respects.
- Required consents: which ones, and what happens if one is not obtained.
- Regulatory approvals.
- No MAE — and note that this is not a practical walk right; see In re IBP, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, 789 A.2d 14 (Del. Ch. 2001) and Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. v. Huntsman Corp., 965 A.2d 715 (Del. Ch. 2008).
- If the buyer needs to be able to walk for a specific risk, is there a specific, quantified condition?
- Financing: is there a financing condition, or a reverse termination fee?
- Termination rights, the outside date, and the fees payable on each termination trigger.
The MAE definition:
- The general clause.
- Carve-outs: economic conditions, industry conditions, law and accounting changes, war and disaster, announcement effects, failure to meet projections, actions at the buyer's request.
- The disproportionate-effect proviso, and which carve-outs it applies to.
- Whether "failure to meet projections" carves out the failure but preserves the underlying cause.
Part 5 — The indemnity package
Survival:
- Operational representations: ____ months (market: 12–24).
- Specified representations, if any: ____ months.
- Fundamental representations: ____ (SOL or a long fixed period).
- Tax: SOL plus ____ days.
- Covenants: pre-closing and post-closing.
- Fraud: unlimited.
- Does a claim survive on notice, or must suit be filed within the period? Specify.
Basket:
- Deductible or tipping? (Deductible is standard above the lower middle market.)
- Amount: ____ (market: 0.5%–1.0% of price).
- De minimis per claim: ____ (market: 0.05%–0.1%), with related claims aggregated.
- Carve-outs from the basket: fundamental representations, fraud, special indemnities, the price adjustment.
Cap:
- Operational: ____ (market: 10%–15% traditional; the retention if insured).
- Fundamental: ____ (market: 100% of price).
- Is each seller's exposure capped at the proceeds it received?
- Is liability several and pro rata, not joint?
Escrow:
- Amount and percentage.
- Term and release schedule; partial release at an interim date?
- Pending claims hold back the claimed amount.
- Escrow agent named; fees allocated; interest treatment specified.
- Is the escrow the exclusive recourse for operational representations? This is distinct from a cap.
Exclusive remedy:
- Present, with carve-outs for fraud, specific performance and injunctive relief, the price adjustment, and separate agreements.
Fraud:
- Is "Fraud" defined? An undefined carve-out swallows every limitation.
- Does the definition require actual, knowing, intentional misrepresentation of a representation in the agreement?
- Does it expressly exclude constructive fraud, equitable fraud, promissory fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and recklessness?
- Is there a full anti-reliance provision disclaiming reliance on extra-contractual statements, projections, and data room materials?
- Confirm the agreement does not attempt to disclaim liability for knowing misrepresentation of a contractual representation — see ABRY Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLC, 891 A.2d 1032 (Del. Ch. 2006).
Sandbagging:
- Pro, anti, or silent? Confirm the choice is deliberate rather than inherited from a form. Delaware generally enforces the contract as written — see Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc., 702 A.2d 1228 (Del. 1997) — but do not leave it to the governing law.
Loss definition:
- Are consequential damages excluded? Is there a carve-out for amounts actually paid to third parties?
- Is diminution in value addressed — multiple-based damages or out-of-pocket?
- Are defense costs indemnifiable?
- Is mitigation required, and is the standard scoped reasonably?
- Are insurance and third-party recoveries netted, and are premium increases and deductibles added back?
- Are tax benefits netted only when actually realized?
- Is double recovery barred across the adjustment, the indemnity, and the insurance policy?
Part 6 — Special indemnities
- Has every material diligence finding been priced — special indemnity, price reduction, excluded liability, or closing condition?
- For each special indemnity: the covered matter defined precisely by reference to the diligence document or schedule item.
- Dollar-one (basket does not apply).
- Cap, or expressly uncapped.
- Survival period appropriate to the risk.
- Separate escrow tranche where the amount warrants.
- Who controls the defense and who must consent to settle.
- What happens if the matter resolves favorably before release.
- Any covenant preventing the buyer from creating or aggravating the liability post-closing.
Part 7 — Representation and warranty insurance
- Limit, retention, premium, and who pays each.
- Does the retention drop after twelve months?
- Is the retention escrow split, and how?
- Read the policy exclusions against the diligence reports. Gaps in diligence become exclusions.
- Confirm known matters are handled by special indemnities, not left to the policy.
- Confirm the policy's survival periods (typically 3 years operational, 6 fundamental).
- Confirm the policy's notice provisions, which are often shorter and stricter than the agreement's.
- Confirm subrogation is waived against the sellers except for fraud.
- Confirm the agreement and the policy define "Loss" consistently.
Part 8 — Earnout
- Is the metric objective and defined by reference to something concrete (SKUs, contracts, a defined chart of accounts)?
- Is the measurement period and payment date specified?
- Are the operating covenants specific: headcount, channel relationships, no reallocation, pricing floors, R&D or marketing spend, no accounting policy changes?
- Are there information rights, with supporting detail and an audit right?
- Is there acceleration on a sale of the business, a change of control, or a covenant breach?
- Is there a dispute mechanism on the expert-determination model?
- May the buyer set off indemnity claims against the earnout? Is it capped?
- Has the seller discounted the earnout appropriately in its own valuation?
Part 9 — Asset deals and distressed sales
Asset deals:
- Assumed liabilities schedule is complete and precise.
- Excluded liabilities are defined broadly and indemnified dollar-one and uncapped.
- Title representations and lien searches for every material asset.
- Consents required to assign: identified, with a plan and a closing condition.
- Successor liability analysis for environmental under CERCLA, multiemployer withdrawal under 29 U.S.C. § 1381, WARN, product liability continuity, and state tax.
- Bulk sales notice and tax clearance certificates where required.
- Allocation of purchase price among asset classes, agreed for tax purposes.
Distressed and 363 sales:
- Confirm the sale order provides free and clear relief under 11 U.S.C. § 363.
- Confirm executory contracts are assumed and assigned under 11 U.S.C. § 365, with cure amounts determined.
- Understand that representations rarely survive and there is usually no escrow; the order and diligence are the protection.
- Analyze which successor liabilities may survive the order notwithstanding.
Part 10 — Claims and the post-closing calendar
Claim procedure:
- Notice content requirements: representation breached, facts, loss, calculation.
- Notice method and addresses.
- Third-party claim procedure: notice period, right to assume the defense, acknowledgment of indemnifiability, counsel approval, consent to settle.
- Carve-outs from the indemnitor's control: injunctive relief, governmental claims, key customer relationships, criminal matters.
- Participation rights and cost allocation.
Post-closing calendar — issue it at closing, with a named owner on each side:
- Escrow release dates and the notice deadlines before each.
- Survival expiry for each representation category, with a review 45 days before each.
- Special indemnity survival dates.
- Working capital statement and objection deadlines.
- Earnout measurement dates and reporting deadlines.
- RWI policy expiry and notice provisions.
- Non-compete and transition services obligations.
- Tax filing and cooperation obligations.
Related documents
- Representations, Warranties, and Indemnification in Acquisition Agreements: Where the Money Actually Moves
- Negotiating the Indemnity Package in a Deal: A Practical Guide
- Acquisition Agreement Toolkit: Reps, Schedules, Escrows, Earnouts, and Claim Notices
- Indemnification and Limitation of Liability: The Risk Allocation Engine of Every Contract
- IP Due Diligence Checklist for Mergers and Acquisitions: A Practical Checklist
- Board Sale Process Checklist: A Practical Checklist
This checklist is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship.