Phase 0—The strategic question (defendants, before anything)

  • If we win, where does the case go?
  • Was the case removed? If so, the remedy is remand, not dismissal.
  • Does the relevant state apply an analogous standing requirement, or has it declined to?
  • Will this plaintiff's counsel refile in state court?
  • Is the claim exclusively federal, with nowhere else to go?
  • What is the actual objective: end the individual claim, defeat a nationwide class, or narrow the class?
  • Is a merits defense with preclusive effect available instead?

Defendants lose more value by winning standing motions that relocate cases than they gain from motions that end them.

Phase 1—The three elements

Injury in fact

  • Concrete—an actual harm, not a bare statutory violation
  • Particularized—affecting this plaintiff personally
  • Actual or imminent, not conjectural

Traceability

  • Fairly traceable to the challenged conduct
  • Not the independent action of a third party not before the court
  • Each link in the causal chain identified

Redressability

  • A favorable decision is likely to remedy the injury
  • The relief sought is available
  • Removing this cause would actually change the outcome

Phase 2—Concreteness analysis

  • Is the harm tangible (physical or monetary)? If so, the analysis is straightforward.
  • If intangible, identify the close historical analogue:
    • Defamation (false statement published to a third party)
    • Public disclosure of private facts
    • Intrusion upon seclusion
    • Conversion
    • Fraud
    • Nuisance
    • First Amendment injury
    • Informational injury (contested; requires purpose and consequence)
  • Does the analogy hold element by element, or does it stretch?
  • For risk of future harm: is damages or injunctive relief sought? Risk supports injunctions, not damages.
  • Were mitigation costs incurred against a non-imminent risk? Clapper forecloses manufacturing standing that way.
  • Is the theory one courts have rejected—"loss of value" of information with no market, anxiety, a technical omission nobody read?

Phase 3—Pleading it (plaintiffs)

  • Plead the harm, not the statutory violation.
  • Name the historical analogue expressly, with the resemblance explained.
  • Plead the downstream consequence: money paid or lost, transaction declined, time spent, benefit denied, opportunity forgone.
  • For risk-based claims, plead materialization—or reframe as prospective relief.
  • Plead traceability link by link where third parties are in the chain.
  • Plead redressability where the relief's effect is not obvious.
  • For classes, define the class around the injury.
  • Do not overplead consequences discovery will not support.

Phase 4—Attacking it (defendants)

Choose the form

  • Facial—accepts allegations, argues legal insufficiency; standard resembles Rule 12(b)(6); produces amendment
  • Factual—contests the truth of jurisdictional allegations; evidence considered; no presumption of truthfulness; plaintiff must come forward with evidence

Draft it

  • Quote the complaint's silence—cite the paragraphs where the missing allegations would appear
  • Address the historical analogue affirmatively; do not wait for the opposition
  • Anticipate informational injury, risk theories, and the congressional-judgment argument
  • Concede any plaintiff who plainly has standing
  • Keep it to 15–20 pages
  • For a factual attack, attach declarations from custodians and the underlying records
  • Brief alternative merits grounds—courts often prefer narrower holdings

Phase 5—Standing discovery

  • Documents concerning the plaintiff's receipt of the communication
  • Whether the plaintiff read or saw the disclosure
  • Any action taken in response
  • Payments made and what was received
  • Evidence of misuse of the plaintiff's information
  • When and how the plaintiff learned of the conduct
  • Communications with any investigator or scanning service before retaining counsel
  • Your own records: delivery logs, access records, forensic reports
  • Deposition: what happened, what changed, what it cost

Phase 6—Class certification

  • Every class member must have standing to recover individual damages.
  • Does the proposed class include uninjured members?
  • Does identifying injured members require individualized inquiry?
  • Build the record: sample the class list and quantify the proportion actually harmed.
  • Support with a custodian declaration describing the data and its limits.
  • Argue predominance under Rule 23(b)(3).
  • Anticipate the narrowed class—decide in advance whether you can live with it.
  • Note: injunctive classes may proceed where damages classes cannot.
  • Settlement classes: consider whether relief may be approved for members who could not have sued.

Phase 7—Mootness

  • Has anything happened during the litigation that ends the plaintiff's personal stake?
  • Voluntary cessation: the burden is on the party asserting mootness to show it is "absolutely clear the wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur"—Laidlaw.
  • To achieve mootness, a defendant needs a binding, irrevocable, broad covenant—Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.—not merely stopping.
  • Picking off the named plaintiff does not work: Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez.
  • Nominal damages preserve the controversy for a completed violation—Uzuegbunam. Plead them where a policy may be withdrawn.
  • Exceptions available: capable of repetition yet evading review; class action relation-back; collateral consequences.

Phase 8—Ripeness and declaratory judgment

  • Is the dispute mature, or contingent on events that may not occur?
  • Is the threatened injury "certainly impending"?
  • For 28 U.S.C. § 2201 actions: is there a substantial controversy of sufficient immediacy and reality?
  • Has the plaintiff manufactured standing by incurring costs against a speculative risk?

Phase 9—Organizational, associational, and third-party standing

Organizational

  • Injury to the organization itself, not merely to its mission
  • Note that an organization cannot "spend its way into standing" by expending resources to oppose a policy—FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Associational

  • Members would have standing individually
  • Interests germane to the organization's purpose
  • Neither the claim nor the relief requires individual member participation—generally bars damages

Third-party

  • Close relationship with the right holder
  • Hindrance to the right holder's own suit
  • Not a generalized grievance—Warth v. Seldin

Phase 10—Practice-area checkpoints

  • Data breach: actual misuse, or exposure only? Forensic evidence obtained?
  • Consumer statutory: was the communication received, read, relied on? Delivery record checked?
  • Environmental: specific use of the affected area pleaded? Traceability through third parties?
  • Competitor: competitive injury, or general interest in lawful government? Would vacatur redress it?
  • IP: licensee holds all substantial rights? DJ controversy sufficiently immediate under MedImmune? Lanham Act zone of interests under Lexmark?
  • Employment: former employee seeking prospective relief?
  • Civil rights: real and immediate threat of repetition? Nominal damages pleaded?

Phase 11—Preservation and appeal

  • Standing may be raised at any time, including first on appeal, and considered sua sponte.
  • The burden escalates: allegations at pleading, specific facts at summary judgment, proof at trial.
  • Re-raise at summary judgment on the developed record.
  • The appellate record cannot be supplemented—build it below.
  • Confirm appellate standing: is your client aggrieved by the judgment?
  • Address jurisdiction affirmatively in the jurisdictional statement.
  • A party discovering a defect in its own case must bring it to the court's attention.

Related documents