Data Breach Response

Intellectual Property and Technology | Privacy and Data Security

We provide rapid breach response counsel including incident investigation, notification compliance, regulatory engagement, and litigation defense.

Overview

Managing Security Incidents and Regulatory Notification Requirements

Data breaches create urgent legal obligations and significant business risk. Notification requirements under GDPR, state breach laws, and sector-specific regulations impose strict timelines that demand rapid response. Beyond compliance, breach response affects customer relationships, regulatory scrutiny, and litigation exposure. This practice helps clients prepare for breaches before they occur and manage incidents effectively when they happen.

Incident Response Planning

Effective breach response begins with preparation. Incident response plans establish procedures and decision-making authority before incidents occur. Plan elements include incident classification frameworks determining response levels, escalation procedures and notification chains, response team roles and responsibilities, communication templates and protocols, third-party resources including forensics and crisis PR on retainer, and documentation requirements for regulatory and litigation purposes. Tabletop exercises test plans and build team readiness. Plans should be reviewed and updated regularly as regulations, business operations, and threat landscapes evolve.

Initial Response and Containment

When breaches are detected, immediate priorities include containing the incident to prevent further data loss, preserving evidence for investigation and potential litigation, activating response team and establishing incident management, initial assessment of scope and severity, and engaging forensic investigators if warranted. Legal counsel involvement from the outset helps protect privilege over investigation activities and ensures compliance obligations are addressed. The first hours after detection often determine whether incidents remain manageable or escalate into crises.

Investigation and Scoping

Understanding what happened and what data was affected is essential for meeting notification obligations and managing response. Forensic investigation determines how the breach occurred, what systems were accessed, what data was compromised, and whether the threat actor has been expelled. Scoping identifies affected individuals and data categories. Investigation should document findings thoroughly to support notification decisions and regulatory inquiries. Balancing thoroughness against notification timelines requires experienced judgment.

Notification Requirements

Breach notification laws impose varying requirements depending on data type, affected individuals' locations, and organizational characteristics. GDPR requires regulator notification within 72 hours and individual notification without undue delay. U.S. state laws have different triggers and timelines—some requiring notification within 30 days. Sector-specific regulations like HIPAA have particular requirements. Analysis must determine which laws apply, what triggers notification obligations, what content notifications must include, and what timelines govern. Counsel navigates overlapping requirements to ensure comprehensive compliance.

Regulatory Communications

Beyond initial notification, breaches often involve ongoing regulatory engagement. Regulators may request additional information about the incident and response. Investigations may examine both the breach and underlying compliance practices. Documentation supporting compliance efforts becomes important. Responses to regulatory inquiries require careful attention to accuracy and privilege concerns. Experienced counsel helps organizations navigate regulatory interactions effectively.

Third-Party Coordination

Breach response typically involves multiple external parties requiring coordination. Forensic investigators conduct technical analysis. Public relations advisors manage communications. Credit monitoring and identity protection services support affected individuals. Insurance carriers have notification requirements and may provide resources. Law enforcement involvement may be required or advisable. Coordinating these parties while maintaining privilege and managing information flow requires experienced oversight.

Litigation Preparation and Defense

Significant breaches increasingly result in litigation—class actions, regulatory enforcement, and individual claims. Litigation preparation begins during response through proper documentation, evidence preservation, and privilege protection. Defense strategy considers what claims may arise and how response actions affect exposure. Document retention and privilege logs support later litigation needs. Counsel balances immediate response needs against longer-term litigation considerations.

Post-Incident Improvement

Breaches provide lessons for improving security and compliance. Post-incident reviews examine what happened, how it could have been prevented, and how response could improve. Remediation addresses identified vulnerabilities. Program improvements strengthen controls and procedures. Documenting improvements demonstrates good faith efforts that may reduce regulatory penalties and litigation exposure. Organizations that learn from incidents emerge stronger.

Frequently Asked Questions

Contain the incident, preserve evidence, engage response counsel, and begin investigation. Avoid actions that could compromise evidence or create liability.

Notification deadlines vary—some as short as 72 hours under GDPR, others reasonable time periods. We analyze applicable requirements and develop compliant timelines.

Requirements may include affected individuals, regulators, law enforcement, and media depending on breach scope and applicable laws.

Usually yes. Forensic investigation determines scope, identifies vulnerabilities, and provides evidence for regulatory and litigation purposes.

Coordinate communications through designated spokespersons. Be factual, express concern, and describe response actions without admitting liability.

Breaches commonly trigger class actions. Defense strategy focuses on standing, class certification, and substantive defenses. Early preparation improves outcomes.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message