International Arbitration

Arbitration | General

Our International Arbitration practice represents clients in cross-border disputes before major arbitral institutions, providing experienced advocacy in commercial, investment, and construction arbitrations worldwide.

Overview

Resolving Cross-Border Disputes

International arbitration provides a flexible, neutral forum for resolving cross-border disputes. MC Law's International Arbitration practice represents clients in arbitrations under all major institutional rules and in ad hoc proceedings.

Commercial Arbitration

We handle complex commercial disputes across industries and geographies. We represent clients in ICC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, AAA-ICDR, and other institutional arbitrations.

Investment Arbitration

We represent investors and states in investment treaty arbitrations. We handle cases under ICSID, UNCITRAL, and other rules arising from bilateral investment treaties and investment contracts.

Frequently Asked Questions

International arbitration is a private dispute resolution process where parties agree to have their dispute decided by one or more arbitrators rather than a court. It offers neutrality, enforceability under the New York Convention, procedural flexibility, and confidentiality advantages over cross-border litigation.

The choice depends on factors including dispute value, complexity, industry, and geographic considerations. Major institutions include the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, and AAA-ICDR, each with different rules, costs, and administrative approaches suited to different types of disputes.

Timelines vary significantly based on complexity, but most institutional arbitrations take 12 to 24 months from filing to award. Expedited procedures are available for smaller or less complex disputes, while large multi-party cases may take longer.

Yes, awards are enforceable in over 170 countries under the New York Convention, making them more readily enforceable across borders than court judgments. Limited grounds for refusal, such as procedural irregularity or public policy violations, exist but are narrowly construed.

Costs include institutional fees, arbitrator fees, legal fees, and expert costs. While arbitration can be expensive, costs are often comparable to or lower than multi-jurisdictional litigation. Many institutions offer cost management tools and expedited procedures for smaller claims.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message