IP Opinion Letters

Home / Practices / IP Opinion Letters
All practices
Intellectual Property and TechnologyGeneral IP

IP opinion letters on patentability, infringement, validity, and freedom to operate, written to hold up under scrutiny, support real business decisions, and establish the good-faith reliance that can defeat a willfulness claim.

An opinion letter is formal legal analysis you can rely on and, when needed, point to. We write opinions on infringement, validity, freedom to operate, and patentability that do more than sit in a file: they back a product launch, answer an investor or lender, satisfy an insurer, and help establish the good-faith reliance that can negate willful infringement. Each one is a genuine exercise of judgment, not protective paperwork, because only a real opinion does any of that work.

Non-Infringement Opinions

We analyze whether your product, service, or feature infringes specific patents, trademarks, or copyrights. On patents that means construing the claims and comparing them to your design element by element. On trademarks we work through the likelihood-of-confusion factors; on copyrights we assess substantial similarity and fair use. The conclusion has to be both well-reasoned enough to rely on and clear enough to act on, so you know whether to ship, redesign, or negotiate.

Invalidity Opinions

When someone asserts a patent or other right against you, we analyze whether it would actually hold up. For patents we dig into prior art, claim scope, and prosecution history, and weigh anticipation, obviousness, enablement, written description, and indefiniteness. For trademarks we look at abandonment, genericness, fraud, and priority. A solid invalidity opinion gives you leverage, whether the next move is a design change, a license negotiation, or a fight.

Freedom To Operate And Patentability

A freedom-to-operate opinion surveys the whole relevant patent landscape before a launch or major technology decision, not just one or two known patents, using systematic searching and analysis of what turns up. A patentability opinion runs the other direction: before you spend on prosecution, we test novelty and non-obviousness against the prior art, gauge achievable claim scope, and tell you whether the filing is worth the investment.

Methodology And Privilege

An opinion is only as reliable as the work behind it. We build on thorough fact investigation and legal research, address the unfavorable factors as squarely as the favorable ones, and state our qualifications honestly so the reasoning holds up. Because opinions carry sensitive analysis, we protect attorney-client privilege and work product from the outset, advise you before any disclosure, and update opinions as new patents issue, claims get construed, or your product changes.

Frequently asked questions

An opinion is worth getting when you're making a significant decision that carries real IP risk, when you need to show you acted in good faith, or when a deal calls for authoritative analysis. We'll tell you straight whether your situation justifies a formal opinion or whether something lighter will do.

It can. A competent opinion of counsel that you actually relied on can defeat a willfulness finding that would otherwise trigger enhanced damages. The catch is timing: the opinion has to exist before the conduct in question, not after you've been accused.

It varies by the type of opinion, but generally we need detailed information about your invention or product, the relevant prior art or third-party patents at issue, and technical specifications. We give you a specific list for your engagement so nothing slows the analysis down.

It tracks with complexity. A straightforward opinion often takes two to four weeks, while a freedom-to-operate opinion covering many patents can run two to three months. We'll work to your timeline without shortchanging the analysis.

Yes, opinions are protected by attorney-client privilege. Be aware, though, that if you later rely on the opinion as a defense, you'll likely waive privilege over that opinion and the related communications, so plan for that before you assert reliance.

A clearance search finds the patents that might be relevant. An opinion is the legal analysis of whether you actually infringe those patents and whether they're valid. The search feeds the opinion, but it doesn't replace the legal judgment that the opinion provides.

Our team

People in this practice

Document products

Related document products

Order attorney-drafted documents related to this practice.

Browse all products

Bring our ip opinion letters team to your next matter.

Get in touch