PTAB Reviews

Home / Practices / PTAB Reviews
All practices
Intellectual Property and TechnologyPatent

PTAB reviews let you challenge or defend patent validity through inter partes review, post-grant review, and related proceedings, and we handle both sides before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, often in coordination with parallel district court litigation.

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board is where patent validity gets fought administratively, frequently faster and cheaper than a district court invalidity case. We file and defend inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and related proceedings, building petitions on the strongest prior art and the right expert testimony, or defending issued patents when they come under attack. Our engineering background helps us read the prior art and the claims the way the Board does, which is exactly where these cases are won and lost.

Inter Partes Review

IPR challenges claims based on prior art patents and printed publications. On the petitioner side, we identify the most compelling references, build petitions around the strongest unpatentability arguments, and support them with expert testimony the Board will credit. On defense, we oppose institution and develop the validity case that keeps the claims standing. Knowing how panels read these petitions shapes how we draft them and how we tear them apart.

Winning the Institution Decision

Many petitions never get instituted, so the institution decision is its own contest. As petitioner, we draft to clear the institution threshold with clear, well-supported invalidity grounds and an eye on discretionary denial. As patent owner, we use the preliminary response to give the Board real reasons to deny institution. Understanding what moves panels at this stage improves outcomes whichever side you're on.

Post-Grant and Legacy Proceedings

Post-grant review allows broader validity challenges, including subject-matter eligibility and written description, but only within nine months of issuance and only for patents with post-AIA effective filing dates. We assess whether PGR fits and move quickly when the window is open. We also handle legacy matters tied to the now-expired covered business method program, addressing proceedings and follow-on issues that still surface from that era.

Coordinating With Litigation and Appeal

PTAB proceedings rarely stand alone; they usually shadow district court litigation. We build coordinated strategies that use the PTAB to your advantage, pursue stays of the parallel case pending the Board's decision, and manage the estoppel that attaches once a final written decision issues. When a PTAB outcome goes the wrong way, we take the appeal to the Federal Circuit, and we defend favorable decisions when the other side appeals.

Frequently asked questions

An IPR is a proceeding at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board where you challenge whether a patent's claims should have been granted. You can only attack validity based on prior patents and printed publications, not on other grounds like the product being on sale. It is usually faster and cheaper than fighting validity in district court.

If you have been sued for infringing the patent, you must file your IPR petition within one year of being served with the complaint. If you have not been sued, there is no fixed deadline. Because that one-year clock is strict, decide early whether IPR is part of your strategy.

Outcomes vary by technology and by the strength of your prior art, so treat any percentage as a rough guide rather than a promise. Two things drive the result: whether the Board institutes the review at all, and then whether you actually prove the claims are unpatentable. We assess your specific prior art before predicting how a petition is likely to fare.

First, file a preliminary response arguing the Board should not institute review at all. If it institutes, you defend the claims with claim construction arguments, expert declarations, and, where it helps, a motion to amend the claims. The goal is to keep your strongest claims standing through the final written decision.

Maybe. The court has discretion to stay the litigation while the IPR plays out, and it weighs how early the case is, how much the two proceedings overlap, and whether the IPR will simplify the issues. A stay can save significant cost, so it is worth requesting when the timing lines up.

PGR is broader: you can challenge a patent on almost any validity ground, not just prior art patents and publications. The tradeoff is the timing. You must file within nine months of the patent issuing, and it is only available for patents examined under the post-March 2013 rules.

Our team

People in this practice

Document products

Related document products

Order attorney-drafted documents related to this practice.

Browse all products

Bring our ptab reviews team to your next matter.

Get in touch