Trademark Licensing

Intellectual Property and Technology | Trademark

We structure and negotiate trademark licenses that monetize brands while maintaining quality control and preserving trademark rights.

Overview

Monetizing Brands Through Strategic Licensing

Trademark licensing enables brand owners to extend their brands into new products, channels, and markets while generating licensing revenue. Our Trademark Licensing practice structures deals that monetize brands effectively while maintaining the quality control essential to preserving trademark rights.

License Structure

Trademark licenses must be structured carefully. We address grant scope, exclusivity, territory, product categories, and distribution channels. We ensure licenses clearly define what licensees can and cannot do with the licensed marks. Ambiguous scope creates disputes; precise definition prevents them.

Quality Control Requirements

Trademark law requires that licensors maintain meaningful control over the nature and quality of goods and services bearing their marks. We structure quality control provisions that satisfy legal requirements without unduly burdening licensees. Failure to maintain quality control can result in trademark abandonment through "naked licensing."

Royalty Structures

Licensing compensation varies by industry and brand strength. We negotiate royalty rates, guaranteed minimums, and advance payments appropriate to the deal. We structure royalty calculations, reporting requirements, and audit rights ensuring licensors receive appropriate compensation.

Merchandising Programs

Brand merchandising creates significant revenue opportunities. We structure merchandising programs with multiple licensees, coordinating product categories and territories. We develop standard license terms while allowing negotiation flexibility for key licensees.

Co-Branding Arrangements

Co-branding combines multiple brands in joint marketing or products. We structure co-branding agreements addressing brand usage, quality standards, liability allocation, and termination. We protect both parties' brand equity in collaborative arrangements.

Franchise Compliance

Franchising involves trademark licensing plus additional regulatory requirements. We ensure franchise arrangements comply with FTC Franchise Rule and state franchise laws while properly licensing the trademark rights that are central to franchise systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trademark law requires licensors to control quality to ensure consumers receive consistent quality when relying on the mark. Failure to maintain control creates 'naked licenses' that can abandon trademark rights.

Rates vary significantly by industry, product category, and brand strength—typically 3-10% of net sales. Comparable licenses and market factors inform appropriate rates.

Licenses should include cure periods for quality failures and termination rights if failures aren't corrected. Monitoring and enforcement are essential.

Yes, exclusive licenses grant sole rights within defined scope. Exclusivity typically commands higher royalties and may include minimum performance requirements.

Sublicensing rights must be explicitly granted. Licensors typically require approval or at minimum notification. Quality control extends through sublicense chains.

International licenses must address which country's marks are licensed, local registration requirements, and compliance with local laws. Territory definitions require precision.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message