Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Motion for Summary Judgment — Full Package
The complete summary judgment package in a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization case: notice, memorandum, separate statement of undisputed facts, evidentiary declaration with exhibits, and proposed order.
This is the most consequential filing in most civil cases, and the components are drafted together so the facts, the brief, and the record citations line up exactly. Assembled so the brief, the statement of facts, and the evidentiary record cite each other exactly, which is where these motions are usually won or lost.
Frequently asked questions
The fee covers the motion, memorandum, and statement of undisputed facts, the evidentiary declaration and exhibit set, and a proposed order in the court's preferred form. It is fixed at this scope: motion, memorandum, statement of facts, declaration, proposed order, up to 5 exhibits, and up to 100 numbered facts. 2 rounds of revisions are included. If your matter falls outside that scope we tell you before starting and quote the difference — we do not bill past a flat fee without agreeing it first.
5 to 8 weeks from a complete set of instructions, plus time for the 2 rounds of revisions included in the fee. If you are working to a court deadline or a closing date, tell us when you order and we will confirm in writing whether we can meet it before you commit.
$29,250 is $325/hour × 90 hours — the time this deliverable takes in an ordinary sherman act section 2 monopolization matter, at the firm's standard rate. Because it is a flat fee, the risk of the work running long sits with the firm: you pay $29,250 whether it takes us the estimate or twice it.
Third-party costs are never inside a flat fee and are passed through at cost, never marked up: court and agency filing fees, court reporter and transcript charges, expert witness fees, search vendor and e-discovery hosting charges, process server fees, and travel.
A short description of the dispute and where it currently stands, the key documents, contracts, and correspondence, the parties involved and any deadlines already running, and the case caption and court, if a matter has been filed. Send what you have — if something is missing we will tell you what else we need before the turnaround clock starts.
Clients also order
Other Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization work MC Law prepares on a flat fee.
Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Motion for Final Approval and Fee Petition
The final approval package for a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization class settlement, with the fairness analysis, the claims administration report, the objection responses, and the attorney's fee and service award petition.
Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Motion to Decertify — Full Package
A decertification motion in a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization case, built on the discovery record showing that the members are not in fact similarly situated or that common issues no longer predominate.
Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement
A preliminary approval motion for a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization class settlement, addressing the Rule 23(e)(2) factors, the notice plan, and the certification of a settlement class.
Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Opposition to Class Certification
An opposition to class certification in a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization case, attacking predominance with individualized-issue evidence, challenging the damages model's fit to the liability theory, and testing the adequacy of the named plaintiffs.
Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Motion for Class Certification — Full Package
A class certification motion in a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization case, working through numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequacy, and the predominance and superiority showings the case requires.
Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization: Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim — Full Package
The complete Rule 12(b)(6) package for a Sherman Act Section 2 Monopolization case: notice of motion, supporting memorandum, declaration with up to five exhibits, and proposed order, filed as one coordinated set.