Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim — Full Package
The complete Rule 12(b)(6) package for a Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense case: notice of motion, supporting memorandum, declaration with up to five exhibits, and proposed order, filed as one coordinated set.
A dismissal motion that is granted ends the case; one that is denied still teaches the plaintiff exactly what to fix, so we file only the arguments worth making. Briefed from the record and the controlling authority in your circuit, with the procedural posture handled as carefully as the merits.
Frequently asked questions
The fee covers the motion and supporting memorandum, the declaration and exhibit set the motion relies on, and a proposed order in the court's preferred form. It is fixed at this scope: motion, memorandum, declaration, proposed order, and up to 5 exhibits. 2 rounds of revisions are included. If your matter falls outside that scope we tell you before starting and quote the difference — we do not bill past a flat fee without agreeing it first.
3 to 5 weeks from a complete set of instructions, plus time for the 2 rounds of revisions included in the fee. If you are working to a court deadline or a closing date, tell us when you order and we will confirm in writing whether we can meet it before you commit.
$12,350 is $325/hour × 38 hours — the time this deliverable takes in an ordinary stark law and anti-kickback civil enforcement defense matter, at the firm's standard rate. Because it is a flat fee, the risk of the work running long sits with the firm: you pay $12,350 whether it takes us the estimate or twice it.
Third-party costs are never inside a flat fee and are passed through at cost, never marked up: court and agency filing fees, court reporter and transcript charges, expert witness fees, search vendor and e-discovery hosting charges, process server fees, and travel.
A short description of the dispute and where it currently stands, the key documents, contracts, and correspondence, the parties involved and any deadlines already running, and the case caption and court, if a matter has been filed. Send what you have — if something is missing we will tell you what else we need before the turnaround clock starts.
Clients also order
Other Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense work MC Law prepares on a flat fee.
Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Motion to Dismiss on Qualified or Sovereign Immunity — Full Package
An immunity motion in a Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense case, raising qualified, absolute, or sovereign immunity at the earliest possible stage.
Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record
A motion for judgment on the administrative record in a Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense matter, applying the standard of review the plan or statute supplies.
Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Response Brief on the Administrative Record
A response brief defending the agency action in a Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense case, on the record and the reasoning the agency actually gave rather than a post hoc rationalization.
Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Complaint
A complaint for Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense drafted to survive a motion to dismiss, not merely to be filed.
Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Opening Brief on the Administrative Record
An opening merits brief in a Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense case decided on the agency record, applying the arbitrary and capricious or substantial evidence standard as the statute directs.
Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense: Motion to Complete or Supplement the Administrative Record
A motion to complete or supplement the record in a Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Civil Enforcement Defense case, on the narrow grounds courts recognize.