Patent disputes turn on technical detail, and we read code and schematics before we read case law. Our attorneys came up as software engineers, so we can take apart a claim chart, an accused product, and a prior-art reference without a translator. That lets us build infringement and validity positions that hold up under cross-examination and make sense to a judge or jury.
Strategy Built Around Your Business
Winning a motion is not the goal; getting you the commercial result you need is. We start by mapping the dispute to what you actually want, whether that is an injunction, a license on your terms, freedom to keep shipping, or a clean exit. From there we shape claim construction, discovery, and trial themes around that outcome rather than chasing every issue the docket offers.
Federal Court, ITC, and PTAB
We handle infringement actions in federal district courts nationwide, Section 337 investigations at the International Trade Commission, inter partes and post-grant review before the PTAB, and appeals to the Federal Circuit. We coordinate these forums deliberately, using a PTAB challenge or an ITC exclusion threat to change the leverage in a parallel district court case rather than running each track in isolation.
Technology We Speak Natively
Software, semiconductors, networking, telecommunications, and connected hardware are home turf for us. Because we have built and shipped technology ourselves, we get up to speed on a new system fast and can tell a clean, accurate story about how it works. That technical credibility shapes how we pick experts, frame claim terms, and decide which fights are worth having.