Our Expertise

Practice Areas

Comprehensive intellectual property services tailored to your business needs.

Patent Prosecution

Strategic patent portfolio development.

Patent Licensing

Monetizing patents through strategic licensing.

Patent Enforcement

Aggressive patent enforcement and defense.

Trademark Registration

Comprehensive clearance and registration.

TTAB Proceedings

Opposition and cancellation proceedings.

Trademark Licensing

Brand licensing and co-existence.

Patent Litigation

Strategic enforcement and defense.

TTAB Proceedings

Oppositions and cancellations before TTAB.

Trade Secret Litigation

Defending proprietary information.

Privacy Compliance

GDPR, CCPA, and global privacy law.

Data Breach Response

Rapid response to security incidents.

Data Governance

Comprehensive data governance programs.

Trade Secret Protection

Comprehensive protection programs.

Trade Secret Litigation

Aggressive enforcement.

Employee Mobility

Managing trade secrets during transitions.

Looking for a Specific Attorney?

View All Attorneys
Latest Insights

Trending Articles & Analysis

Stay informed with expert analysis on IP law developments.

AILitigation
2026-02-15 23:52:38.0735838 min read

Capturing the Web: A Practitioner's Guide to Authenticating Website Screenshots as Evidence in Federal Court

Website screenshots, social media posts, and archived web pages have become indispensable evidence in federal civil litigation—yet their admissibility depends on clearing evidentiary hurdles that many practitioners underestimate. This comprehensive guide walks attorneys through every stage of the authentication process, beginning with the foundational requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a) and the landmark Lorraine v. Markel framework that Judge Paul Grimm established in 2007 for evaluating electronically stored information. It examines the specific challenges of authenticating current website captures (through witness testimony, forensic capture tools, and Rule 902(13) certifications), historical Wayback Machine evidence (through Internet Archive affidavits, testimony under Rule 901(b)(9), and stipulations), and social media content (where courts have applied varying levels of scrutiny to screenshots, metadata, and platform-produced records). The article provides detailed analysis of the Fifth Circuit's 2022 Weinhoffer v. Davie Shoring decision—which clarified that Wayback Machine printouts cannot be judicially noticed without foundational proof—and the Second Circuit's Gasperini holding affirming Wayback Machine reliability when accompanied by testimony about the Archive's processes. It explores the hearsay complexities unique to web evidence (including the double-hearsay problem for archived pages), the business records exception under Rule 803(6), non-hearsay uses of website content, and the residual exception. New sections address the emerging challenge of AI-generated deepfakes and their implications for digital evidence authentication, including Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707 (currently in public comment through February 2026), Proposed Rule 901(c) on deepfake evidence, and state-level developments including Louisiana's pioneering Act No. 178. The article concludes with a detailed practitioner's checklist covering pre-litigation evidence preservation, discovery-phase strategies, authentication methods keyed to evidence type, hearsay exception selection, and trial preparation for common challenges to web-based evidence.

Read Article →
View All Insights

Looking for a Practice Area?

View All Practice Areas

More Publications

Latest Headlines

How Can We Help?

Our team of experienced IP attorneys is ready to assist.

Headquarters

1441 U St., Suite 712
Washington DC, 20009

Send Us a Message