Document type: Checklist Practice area: Corporate — Corporate Governance Jurisdiction: Delaware, with notes on other states Last reviewed: 5 September 2026
Section 1 — Stockholder: before drafting
- Standing confirmed: record holder, or beneficial owner with documentary evidence
- Brokerage or custodial statement obtained
- Continuity of ownership documented through the relevant period
- Power of attorney executed if counsel will sign
- Entity type confirmed — corporation (statutory right) or LLC/LP (read the operating agreement first)
- State of incorporation confirmed; non-Delaware statute reviewed
- Limitations period assessed; tolling agreement considered
Section 2 — Stockholder: assembling credible basis
Attach the exhibits. Do not assert.
- Restatement or material weakness disclosure
- Government investigation, subpoena, enforcement action, or consent decree
- Recall, safety event, or regulatory finding, with any prior warnings
- Auditor resignation or reportable event
- Whistleblower accounts, however reported
- Related litigation raising the same conduct
- Media or analyst reports with specific factual allegations
- Related-party transactions on unusual terms, from proxy disclosure
- A documented pattern where no single item suffices
- Confirmed the predicate is not merely a stock decline, a bad quarter, or disagreement with compensation
Section 3 — Stockholder: drafting
- Demand is under oath
- Purpose stated specifically, and multiple related purposes stated where genuinely held
- Purpose does not overstate or include objectives not actually held
- Categories tied explicitly to the purpose
- Every category temporally bounded
- Phrasing uses "minutes and materials" and "documents sufficient to show" — not "all documents relating to"
- Category seeking disposition of complaints, not merely their existence
- Electronic communications reserved, not demanded at the outset
- Offer to enter a reasonable confidentiality agreement
- Standing evidence and credible-basis exhibits attached
Section 4 — Stockholder: service
- Served on the registered agent and the corporate secretary
- Method producing proof of delivery
- Response period calendared
- Do not file reflexively on the first available day — negotiation is usually faster and broader
Section 5 — Company: day one
- Preservation hold issued and documented
- Custodians and systems identified: corporate secretary, board portal, general counsel, committee chairs, internal audit, compliance complaint log, finance
- Routine deletion suspended
- No substantive response sent yet
- General counsel and relevant committee chair notified
Section 6 — Company: assess honestly
- Standing established?
- Form correct — sworn, purpose stated, properly served?
- Purpose proper?
- Credible basis present? Where there is a restatement, an enforcement action, a whistleblower report, or a repeated auditor risk designation, the answer is almost certainly yes
- Likely responsive records reviewed in substance before any position is taken on scope
- Assessment recorded in writing
Section 7 — Company: brief the board
- Demand and stated purpose
- The predicate the stockholder has assembled
- What the responsive records actually show
- Response options and consequences, including the cost of a published opinion
- Whether the underlying facts warrant the company's own inquiry — frequently the most valuable output
- Briefing minuted
Section 8 — Scope negotiation
Concede: formal board and committee minutes and materials on the subject matter.
Resist, with reasons:
- Vague categories — ask what is actually wanted
- Unbounded periods — propose conduct plus a reasonable lead-in
- Categories untethered to the stated purpose
- Electronic communications — make the sufficiency argument only if the formal records support it
Insist on:
- Incorporation by reference — the most valuable available condition
- Confidentiality, negotiated and not indefinite
- A completeness provision, so the same demand is not relitigated
Stockholder insists on:
- Use in litigation and public filing, subject to a sealing process
- A defined confidentiality term
- Express reservation of electronic communications on a further showing
- Completeness representations describing what was searched
Section 9 — Running the production
- All sources searched, including the board portal
- Search methodology documented: sources, custodians, criteria, date range
- Privilege reviewed; log provided; over-designation avoided
- Fiduciary exception considered before asserting privilege broadly
- Redactions limited to competitively sensitive and personal information, and described
- Produced in usable electronic format, organized by agreed category
- Cover letter mapping documents to categories
- Completeness statement provided
- Produced within the agreed period
- Production set and methodology preserved
Section 10 — After production
Stockholder:
- Read everything before drafting
- Build a chronology from the documents first
- Identify what is absent; confirm absence is real from the completeness statement
- Test the strongest allegation against the whole production
- Consider whether the right outcome is a letter to the board rather than a complaint
Company:
- Remediate any gap the review revealed, and document the fix
- Report to the board on the production and the remediation
- Preserve the production set
Section 11 — Stockholder list demands
- Purpose: communicating with fellow stockholders — proper essentially per se
- Request the ledger and the CEDE breakdown, NOBO list, and daily transfer sheets
- Request electronic format
- File promptly and seek expedition if the response is not immediate
- Company: produce promptly with use restrictions rather than refusing
Section 12 — Director inspection demands
- Scope is broad; no stockholder-style proper purpose required
- Company may resist only on a showing that the purpose is adverse to the corporation
- Privileged investigative materials concerning the director's own conduct may be withheld — with a documented determination
- Never withhold silently; state the basis or apply to the court
Section 13 — Red flags that cost weeks
In a demand:
- Not sworn
- Signed by counsel with no documented authority
- No standing evidence attached
- Purpose stated as a conclusion, with no supporting exhibits
- "All documents relating to" as the category structure
- No temporal bounds
- Electronic communications demanded at the outset
- Purpose that includes objectives the stockholder does not hold
In a response:
- Refusal sent before anyone read the predicate
- Position taken on scope before the records were reviewed
- No preservation hold
- Board not briefed
- Demand for indefinite, unconditional confidentiality
- No incorporation-by-reference condition sought
- Slow production after a narrow negotiation
- Different productions to different demanding stockholders
Section 14 — Preventive practices for companies
Complete these annually; they determine what a future production looks like.
- Minutes record substance — what was presented, what directors asked, what the answers were, what was decided
- Board and committee materials retained by meeting, per the retention policy
- Complaints concerning financial reporting, compliance, or senior management reach the audit committee, are discussed, and are minuted with the disposition recorded
- Each mission-critical risk has a named committee owner and a documented reporting cadence
- Significant decisions made in meetings, not by text message among a subset of directors
- Record retention policy followed, suspended properly on a trigger, and both documented
- Board portal treated as a records repository with defined retention
- Annual review of whether the formal record would answer a demand about each principal risk
The single highest-value item on this list is the complaint escalation entry. A record showing that a hotline report reached the committee, was discussed, and was resolved defeats an oversight claim. Its absence, in a production that is otherwise complete, proves one.
Section 15 — Category translation table
Use this to convert what you want to know into a category a court will order.
| What you want to know | Category that works | Category that does not |
|---|---|---|
| Did the board know? | Minutes and materials of the Board and the [__] Committee relating to [subject], for [period] | All documents concerning [subject] |
| What did the auditors say? | Materials provided to the Board or Audit Committee by [auditor] relating to [subject] | All communications with the auditors |
| Did anyone complain? | Reports to the Board or any committee concerning complaints, hotline reports, or internal investigations relating to [subject], and documents sufficient to show the disposition of each | All hotline reports |
| Who owned oversight? | Documents sufficient to show which committee had oversight responsibility for [subject] and the reporting cadence | All risk management documents |
| Are the directors independent? | Director and officer questionnaires for [years]; materials provided to the Board concerning director relationships | All documents concerning independence |
| What did management tell the board? | Presentations and materials provided to the Board or any committee by management relating to [subject] | All internal communications |
| Was there self-dealing? | Minutes and materials relating to any transaction between the Company and [named parties], and documents sufficient to show the approval of each | All related-party transaction documents |
| How did the board respond? | Minutes and materials concerning [the event] and any remediation, from [date] to present | All documents about the incident |
Three drafting rules. Use "minutes and materials" and "documents sufficient to show." Bound every category by date and by subject. And ask for dispositions, not just documents — whether anything happened after a complaint arrived is usually the whole question.
Section 16 — Seeking electronic communications on a second request
- Identify the specific gaps in the formal production: decisions with no minutes; subjects acknowledged but absent; minutes recording that a matter was "discussed" with no substance
- Name specific custodians, not the organization
- Bound the period tightly
- Define the subject narrowly
- Propose search terms and a proportionate protocol
- Company: respond by showing what the formal records contain, which is the only credible sufficiency argument
- Both sides: address personal devices explicitly, including privacy and collection method
- Both sides: weigh cost against whether the incremental documents change the outcome
Related documents
- Books-and-records demands: Section 220, proper purpose, and the documents you actually get
- Making or answering a books-and-records demand: a practical guide
- Books-and-records toolkit: demand letters, production protocols, and confidentiality orders
- Litigation hold and evidence preservation checklist
- Controlled company governance checklist