Document type: Checklist Practice area: Corporate — Corporate Governance Jurisdiction: Delaware, with notes on other states Last reviewed: 5 September 2026


Section 1 — Stockholder: before drafting

  • Standing confirmed: record holder, or beneficial owner with documentary evidence
  • Brokerage or custodial statement obtained
  • Continuity of ownership documented through the relevant period
  • Power of attorney executed if counsel will sign
  • Entity type confirmed — corporation (statutory right) or LLC/LP (read the operating agreement first)
  • State of incorporation confirmed; non-Delaware statute reviewed
  • Limitations period assessed; tolling agreement considered

Section 2 — Stockholder: assembling credible basis

Attach the exhibits. Do not assert.

  • Restatement or material weakness disclosure
  • Government investigation, subpoena, enforcement action, or consent decree
  • Recall, safety event, or regulatory finding, with any prior warnings
  • Auditor resignation or reportable event
  • Whistleblower accounts, however reported
  • Related litigation raising the same conduct
  • Media or analyst reports with specific factual allegations
  • Related-party transactions on unusual terms, from proxy disclosure
  • A documented pattern where no single item suffices
  • Confirmed the predicate is not merely a stock decline, a bad quarter, or disagreement with compensation

Section 3 — Stockholder: drafting

  • Demand is under oath
  • Purpose stated specifically, and multiple related purposes stated where genuinely held
  • Purpose does not overstate or include objectives not actually held
  • Categories tied explicitly to the purpose
  • Every category temporally bounded
  • Phrasing uses "minutes and materials" and "documents sufficient to show" — not "all documents relating to"
  • Category seeking disposition of complaints, not merely their existence
  • Electronic communications reserved, not demanded at the outset
  • Offer to enter a reasonable confidentiality agreement
  • Standing evidence and credible-basis exhibits attached

Section 4 — Stockholder: service

  • Served on the registered agent and the corporate secretary
  • Method producing proof of delivery
  • Response period calendared
  • Do not file reflexively on the first available day — negotiation is usually faster and broader

Section 5 — Company: day one

  • Preservation hold issued and documented
  • Custodians and systems identified: corporate secretary, board portal, general counsel, committee chairs, internal audit, compliance complaint log, finance
  • Routine deletion suspended
  • No substantive response sent yet
  • General counsel and relevant committee chair notified

Section 6 — Company: assess honestly

  • Standing established?
  • Form correct — sworn, purpose stated, properly served?
  • Purpose proper?
  • Credible basis present? Where there is a restatement, an enforcement action, a whistleblower report, or a repeated auditor risk designation, the answer is almost certainly yes
  • Likely responsive records reviewed in substance before any position is taken on scope
  • Assessment recorded in writing

Section 7 — Company: brief the board

  • Demand and stated purpose
  • The predicate the stockholder has assembled
  • What the responsive records actually show
  • Response options and consequences, including the cost of a published opinion
  • Whether the underlying facts warrant the company's own inquiry — frequently the most valuable output
  • Briefing minuted

Section 8 — Scope negotiation

Concede: formal board and committee minutes and materials on the subject matter.

Resist, with reasons:

  • Vague categories — ask what is actually wanted
  • Unbounded periods — propose conduct plus a reasonable lead-in
  • Categories untethered to the stated purpose
  • Electronic communications — make the sufficiency argument only if the formal records support it

Insist on:

  • Incorporation by reference — the most valuable available condition
  • Confidentiality, negotiated and not indefinite
  • A completeness provision, so the same demand is not relitigated

Stockholder insists on:

  • Use in litigation and public filing, subject to a sealing process
  • A defined confidentiality term
  • Express reservation of electronic communications on a further showing
  • Completeness representations describing what was searched

Section 9 — Running the production

  • All sources searched, including the board portal
  • Search methodology documented: sources, custodians, criteria, date range
  • Privilege reviewed; log provided; over-designation avoided
  • Fiduciary exception considered before asserting privilege broadly
  • Redactions limited to competitively sensitive and personal information, and described
  • Produced in usable electronic format, organized by agreed category
  • Cover letter mapping documents to categories
  • Completeness statement provided
  • Produced within the agreed period
  • Production set and methodology preserved

Section 10 — After production

Stockholder:

  • Read everything before drafting
  • Build a chronology from the documents first
  • Identify what is absent; confirm absence is real from the completeness statement
  • Test the strongest allegation against the whole production
  • Consider whether the right outcome is a letter to the board rather than a complaint

Company:

  • Remediate any gap the review revealed, and document the fix
  • Report to the board on the production and the remediation
  • Preserve the production set

Section 11 — Stockholder list demands

  • Purpose: communicating with fellow stockholders — proper essentially per se
  • Request the ledger and the CEDE breakdown, NOBO list, and daily transfer sheets
  • Request electronic format
  • File promptly and seek expedition if the response is not immediate
  • Company: produce promptly with use restrictions rather than refusing

Section 12 — Director inspection demands

  • Scope is broad; no stockholder-style proper purpose required
  • Company may resist only on a showing that the purpose is adverse to the corporation
  • Privileged investigative materials concerning the director's own conduct may be withheld — with a documented determination
  • Never withhold silently; state the basis or apply to the court

Section 13 — Red flags that cost weeks

In a demand:

  • Not sworn
  • Signed by counsel with no documented authority
  • No standing evidence attached
  • Purpose stated as a conclusion, with no supporting exhibits
  • "All documents relating to" as the category structure
  • No temporal bounds
  • Electronic communications demanded at the outset
  • Purpose that includes objectives the stockholder does not hold

In a response:

  • Refusal sent before anyone read the predicate
  • Position taken on scope before the records were reviewed
  • No preservation hold
  • Board not briefed
  • Demand for indefinite, unconditional confidentiality
  • No incorporation-by-reference condition sought
  • Slow production after a narrow negotiation
  • Different productions to different demanding stockholders

Section 14 — Preventive practices for companies

Complete these annually; they determine what a future production looks like.

  • Minutes record substance — what was presented, what directors asked, what the answers were, what was decided
  • Board and committee materials retained by meeting, per the retention policy
  • Complaints concerning financial reporting, compliance, or senior management reach the audit committee, are discussed, and are minuted with the disposition recorded
  • Each mission-critical risk has a named committee owner and a documented reporting cadence
  • Significant decisions made in meetings, not by text message among a subset of directors
  • Record retention policy followed, suspended properly on a trigger, and both documented
  • Board portal treated as a records repository with defined retention
  • Annual review of whether the formal record would answer a demand about each principal risk

The single highest-value item on this list is the complaint escalation entry. A record showing that a hotline report reached the committee, was discussed, and was resolved defeats an oversight claim. Its absence, in a production that is otherwise complete, proves one.

Section 15 — Category translation table

Use this to convert what you want to know into a category a court will order.

What you want to know Category that works Category that does not
Did the board know? Minutes and materials of the Board and the [__] Committee relating to [subject], for [period] All documents concerning [subject]
What did the auditors say? Materials provided to the Board or Audit Committee by [auditor] relating to [subject] All communications with the auditors
Did anyone complain? Reports to the Board or any committee concerning complaints, hotline reports, or internal investigations relating to [subject], and documents sufficient to show the disposition of each All hotline reports
Who owned oversight? Documents sufficient to show which committee had oversight responsibility for [subject] and the reporting cadence All risk management documents
Are the directors independent? Director and officer questionnaires for [years]; materials provided to the Board concerning director relationships All documents concerning independence
What did management tell the board? Presentations and materials provided to the Board or any committee by management relating to [subject] All internal communications
Was there self-dealing? Minutes and materials relating to any transaction between the Company and [named parties], and documents sufficient to show the approval of each All related-party transaction documents
How did the board respond? Minutes and materials concerning [the event] and any remediation, from [date] to present All documents about the incident

Three drafting rules. Use "minutes and materials" and "documents sufficient to show." Bound every category by date and by subject. And ask for dispositions, not just documents — whether anything happened after a complaint arrived is usually the whole question.

Section 16 — Seeking electronic communications on a second request

  • Identify the specific gaps in the formal production: decisions with no minutes; subjects acknowledged but absent; minutes recording that a matter was "discussed" with no substance
  • Name specific custodians, not the organization
  • Bound the period tightly
  • Define the subject narrowly
  • Propose search terms and a proportionate protocol
  • Company: respond by showing what the formal records contain, which is the only credible sufficiency argument
  • Both sides: address personal devices explicitly, including privacy and collection method
  • Both sides: weigh cost against whether the incremental documents change the outcome

Related documents