Intellectual PropertyTrademark Litigation
Counterfeiting, Seizure Orders, and Schedule A Litigation: Fighting Fakes in Federal Court
Counterfeiting is trademark infringement with the volume turned up, and Congress gave brand owners a set of remedies that exist nowhere else in intellectual property law: ex parte seizure of goods and records, mandatory treble damages, statutory damages of up to $2 million per mark per type of goods, and criminal penalties. This article explains what legally counts as a counterfeit, how the ex parte seizure procedure in 15 U.S.C. section 1116(d) actually works and why it is used less often than people assume, and how the modern enforcement workhorse operates: the Schedule A case, in which a brand joins dozens or hundreds of anonymous online sellers in a single complaint, obtains a sealed temporary restraining order freezing their marketplace accounts, and serves them by email. It covers the mounting judicial criticism of that practice, the joinder and personal jurisdiction defenses that are starting to work, contributory liability for marketplaces and landlords after Tiffany v. eBay and Inwood, customs recordation and border enforcement, criminal referrals, and defense strategy for sellers who are swept up. It closes with a program-building checklist, a worked example, an FAQ, and related reading.