Arbitral Awards Challenges

Arbitration | Post-Award

We represent parties seeking to challenge, annul, or set aside arbitral awards, as well as those defending awards against such challenges in courts worldwide.

Overview

Protecting and Challenging Arbitration Outcomes

While arbitral awards are generally final and binding, limited grounds exist for challenge. MC Law's Arbitral Awards Challenges practice represents parties seeking to set aside unfavorable awards and those defending awards against challenge.

Grounds for Challenge

Award challenges rest on narrow grounds under applicable arbitration law. Common grounds include lack of jurisdiction, procedural irregularities, arbitrator misconduct, public policy violations, and excess of authority.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common grounds include lack of jurisdiction, procedural irregularity, failure to give proper notice, arbitrator misconduct or bias, excess of authority, and public policy violations. The specific grounds depend on the applicable law and arbitration rules.

Setting aside is pursued in the courts of the seat of arbitration and can nullify the award entirely. Annulment applies in specific contexts like ICSID and involves review by an ad hoc committee. Both are distinct from resisting enforcement in another jurisdiction.

Time limits vary by jurisdiction but are typically short—often 30 to 90 days from receipt of the award. Missing the deadline can permanently waive the right to challenge, making prompt legal assessment essential.

Generally, no. Most jurisdictions do not permit review of the merits of the arbitrators' decision. Challenge grounds are limited to serious procedural defects, jurisdictional issues, or public policy violations rather than substantive errors.

If an award is set aside, the dispute may need to be re-arbitrated before a new tribunal. If enforcement is refused in one jurisdiction, the award holder may still seek enforcement elsewhere. The practical consequences depend on the grounds for the challenge and applicable law.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message