DMCA Compliance and Enforcement
Intellectual Property and Technology | CopyrightWe advise on Digital Millennium Copyright Act compliance including takedown procedures, safe harbor requirements, anti-circumvention provisions, and counter-notification responses.
Overview
Navigating Digital Copyright Protection and Platform Liability
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act fundamentally reshaped copyright law for the digital age, creating both obligations and protections that affect content creators, online platforms, and technology companies. The DMCA's safe harbor provisions shield qualifying platforms from liability for user-posted infringing content, while its notice-and-takedown procedures give copyright owners tools to remove infringing material without litigation. The anti-circumvention provisions protect technological measures that control access to copyrighted works. This practice helps clients on all sides of DMCA issues navigate this complex statutory framework effectively.
Safe Harbor Compliance for Platforms
Online service providers can qualify for DMCA safe harbors that limit liability for user-posted infringing content, but qualification requires strict compliance with statutory requirements. Platforms must designate an agent to receive takedown notices and register that agent with the Copyright Office. They must adopt and reasonably implement policies for terminating repeat infringers. They must accommodate standard technical measures used by copyright owners to identify and protect their works. Platforms must respond expeditiously to valid takedown notices by removing or disabling access to identified material. They must not have actual knowledge of infringement or be aware of facts making infringement apparent. Counsel helps platforms establish and maintain compliant programs that preserve safe harbor protection.
Takedown Notice Practice
Copyright owners use DMCA takedown notices to remove infringing content from online platforms without the expense and delay of litigation. Effective takedown practice requires notices that contain all statutorily required elements, accurately identify copyrighted works and infringing material, provide sufficient location information for platforms to find infringing content, and make appropriate representations under penalty of perjury. High-volume enforcers need efficient processes for identifying infringement, generating notices, and tracking platform responses. Follow-up addresses situations where platforms fail to remove content or where infringers repost removed material. Strategic decisions balance the value of removing specific infringement against the costs of notice generation and processing.
Counter-Notification and Put-Back Procedures
When content is removed pursuant to a takedown notice, the person who posted it may submit a counter-notification asserting that removal was improper. The platform must then notify the copyright owner, who has 10-14 business days to file a federal court lawsuit seeking an order to restrain the alleged infringer. If no lawsuit is filed, the platform must restore the removed content. Counsel advises content posters on whether counter-notification is appropriate, drafts compliant counter-notices, and advises copyright owners on whether to file suit to maintain removal. Understanding this process is essential for both copyright owners and content posters.
Anti-Circumvention Provisions
DMCA Section 1201 prohibits circumventing technological measures that control access to copyrighted works and trafficking in circumvention tools. These provisions protect DRM systems, access controls, and copy protection technologies independent of underlying copyright infringement claims. Violations can result in civil liability and criminal penalties. Exemptions exist for certain activities including security research, interoperability, and uses recognized by the Copyright Office triennial rulemaking. Counsel advises technology companies on whether proposed products or services implicate anti-circumvention provisions and how to structure offerings to avoid liability.
Platform Policy Development
Effective content moderation requires policies that go beyond mere DMCA compliance. Comprehensive copyright policies address how the platform processes takedown notices and counter-notices, what constitutes repeat infringer behavior and how it is tracked, how the platform handles disputed content, relationships with rights holders including trusted sender programs, and proactive measures to prevent infringement. Well-designed policies protect safe harbor status while enabling legitimate platform operations and minimizing abuse of takedown procedures.
Content Creator Protection
Content creators face both the risk of infringement by others and the risk of having their own content wrongly removed through DMCA abuse. Counsel helps creators register copyrights to enable enforcement, send effective takedown notices when their content is infringed, respond to improper takedown notices targeting their legitimate content, and understand their rights under the DMCA framework. Balanced advice recognizes that many creators are both copyright owners and content posters who may be on either side of DMCA disputes.
Our Services
copyright
Federal registration and validity opinions
internet
Federal registration and validity opinions
intellectual_property_and_technology
Federal registration and validity opinions
copyright_enforcement
Federal registration and validity opinions
Licensing & Transactions
Negotiate and draft license agreements
DMCA Services
Takedown notices and counter-notices
Enforcement
Cease and desist through litigation
Fair Use Analysis
Evaluate fair use defenses and risks
Music & Entertainment
Industry-specific copyright matters
Frequently Asked Questions
A valid notice must identify the copyrighted work, identify the infringing material with sufficient information to locate it, include your contact information, and include statements made under penalty of perjury regarding ownership and good faith belief of infringement.
Platforms must designate an agent with the Copyright Office, implement a repeat infringer policy, accommodate standard technical measures, and respond expeditiously to takedown notices. Ongoing compliance is required to maintain protection.
You have 10-14 business days to file a federal lawsuit to prevent content restoration. If you don't file suit, the platform must restore the content. We advise on whether litigation is warranted.
Yes, Section 512(f) provides liability for knowingly material misrepresentations in takedown notices. However, courts have set a high bar for such claims. Notices should always be accurate.
Section 1201 prohibits circumventing technological protection measures that control access to copyrighted works, and prohibits trafficking in circumvention tools. Exemptions are granted through triennial rulemaking.
The DMCA requires 'expeditious' removal but doesn't specify exact timing. Most platforms remove content within 24-72 hours of receiving a valid notice.
Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.
For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.
Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.
Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.
Related Matters
Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.
Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.
Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.
Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.
Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.
Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.
Get in Touch
Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter