Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property and Technology | IP Litigation

Our IP Litigation practice handles disputes involving patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets, combining deep IP knowledge with trial experience.

Overview

Protecting Innovation Through Litigation

IP disputes often involve companies' most valuable assets. MC Law's IP Litigation practice combines deep IP expertise with proven trial capability.

Patent Litigation

We handle patent disputes across technologies and forums in federal district courts, before the ITC, and in PTAB proceedings.

Trademark Litigation We protect brands through enforcement and defense of trademark claims in federal court and before the TTAB. Copyright Litigation We enforce and defend copyright claims for all types of works. Trade Secret Litigation We protect confidential information through aggressive trade secret enforcement under the DTSA and state laws. Technical Excellence Our attorneys bring technical backgrounds in engineering, science, and technology. Strategic Approach Every case receives customized strategy aligned with business objectives.

Frequently Asked Questions

We handle patent infringement, trademark disputes, copyright litigation, trade secret misappropriation, design patent cases, and unfair competition claims in federal and state courts, the ITC, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and arbitration.

Hatch-Waxman governs pharmaceutical patent disputes triggered by generic drug applications. Brand companies file suit within 45 days of receiving paragraph IV certification, triggering a 30-month stay of FDA approval. Cases require specialized knowledge of patent law and FDA regulations.

Trade secret litigation under the Defend Trade Secrets Act and state laws requires showing the information qualifies as a trade secret, reasonable measures were taken to maintain secrecy, and the defendant misappropriated it. Remedies include injunctions, damages, and in exceptional cases exemplary damages.

The International Trade Commission investigates unfair import practices including patent and trademark infringement. ITC proceedings are faster than district court, offer exclusion orders blocking imports, and provide a powerful enforcement tool for IP owners facing infringing imports.

The PTAB conducts inter partes review, post-grant review, and covered business method review to challenge patent validity. PTAB proceedings offer faster, less expensive alternatives to district court invalidity defenses and have become a critical component of patent litigation strategy.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message