Internal Investigations

Home / Practices / Internal Investigations
All practices
Labor and EmploymentInvestigations

Internal investigations that stand up to scrutiny: we conduct independent, prompt workplace investigations into harassment, discrimination, and misconduct, delivering findings you can act on and defend.

When a complaint comes in, how you investigate matters as much as what you find, because a sloppy or biased inquiry becomes its own liability. We conduct independent internal investigations into harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and workplace misconduct, gathering the facts, weighing credibility, and producing findings you can rely on whether the next step is corrective action, a closed file, or a courtroom.

Independent And Prompt Response

Courts and agencies expect a prompt, impartial response to workplace complaints, and bringing in outside counsel signals exactly that. As external investigators we have no stake in the outcome and no relationship to protect, which makes our conclusions harder to attack as a cover-up. We move quickly, because delay both prolongs the harm and undercuts the affirmative defenses available to employers who act decisively.

Fact-Finding And Interviews

Good investigations are built on careful fact-finding, not assumptions. We plan the scope, identify witnesses, and conduct structured interviews of the complainant, the accused, and others with knowledge, while documenting each step. We gather and preserve the relevant documents — emails, messages, and electronic records — and we handle digital evidence with the technical care our engineering background makes second nature.

Credibility And Findings

When accounts conflict, someone has to decide what likely happened. We assess credibility using the recognized factors — corroboration, plausibility, motive, consistency, and demeanor — rather than gut feeling. We apply the correct standard of proof, make clear findings on each allegation, and deliver a written report that explains the reasoning. The result is a conclusion that supports your decision and withstands second-guessing.

Confidentiality And Privilege

Investigations create sensitive records, and mishandling privilege or confidentiality can expose everything you wanted protected. We structure the engagement with attorney-client privilege and work-product protection in mind, advise on what can and cannot be promised to witnesses, and guard against retaliation during the process. We help you decide what to disclose, to whom, and when, so the investigation resolves the issue without creating a new one.

Frequently asked questions

Open an investigation when you get a complaint of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, a policy violation, a safety concern, fraud, or similar misconduct. For many complaints, prompt investigation isn't just smart, it's legally required, and acting quickly shows good faith. Waiting or ignoring a complaint is one of the surest ways to lose the later lawsuit.

Pick someone trained, impartial, and free of any conflict of interest, which might be an HR professional, in-house counsel, or an outside investigator. For sensitive matters or anything involving senior people, an outside investigator gives you cleaner independence. The investigator's credibility is what makes the findings hold up.

Define the scope, gather the relevant documents and policies, then interview the complainant, the accused, and any witnesses. Weigh the evidence, reach conclusions, write up the findings in a report, and recommend corrective action. Following the same sequence each time is what keeps the result defensible.

They may be, if the investigation is conducted at the direction of counsel for the purpose of giving legal advice, but it's not automatic. Privilege can be waived by disclosure, and how far it reaches varies by jurisdiction. Decide up front whether you want privilege to apply and set the protocols before the investigation starts, because you can't reliably add it later.

Take corrective action that fits the findings, tell the complainant and the accused the outcome to the extent appropriate, and document how it was resolved. Then ask whether anything systemic, like a policy update or training, would keep the same problem from recurring. Closing the loop this way is part of what limits your exposure going forward.

Our team

People in this practice

Document products

Related document products

Order attorney-drafted documents related to this practice.

Browse all products

Bring our internal investigations team to your next matter.

Get in touch