Harassment

Labor and Employment | Claims

We defend employers against harassment claims and advise on prevention and response programs including policies, training, investigations, and remedial measures.

Overview

Preventing and Defending Harassment Claims

Harassment claims create significant liability and reputational exposure for employers. MC Law's Harassment practice helps employers prevent harassment through effective policies and training, respond appropriately when complaints arise, and defend claims vigorously.

Claims Defense

We defend employers against all forms of workplace harassment claims. We develop defenses including the Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense and challenge plaintiffs' proof of severe or pervasive conduct.

Investigations Prompt, thorough investigation is essential to complaint response. We conduct independent harassment investigations, assess complaint credibility, and advise on appropriate remedial action. Prevention Programs Prevention is the best defense. We develop comprehensive anti-harassment policies, conduct training for employees and managers, and help employers create cultures where harassment does not occur. Supervisor Training Supervisors play critical roles in harassment prevention and response. We train supervisors on recognizing harassment, responding to complaints, avoiding retaliation, and modeling appropriate workplace behavior. Third-Party Harassment Employers may face liability for harassment by non-employees including customers, vendors, and visitors. We advise on employer obligations regarding third-party harassment. Remedial Measures Appropriate response to substantiated complaints is essential. We advise on proportionate discipline, separation of parties, and other remedial measures that address harassment while avoiding claims of inadequate response or retaliation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Harassment is unwelcome conduct based on a protected characteristic that is either severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile work environment, or that results in a tangible employment action such as termination or demotion. A single severe incident can constitute harassment.

An effective policy should define prohibited conduct broadly, cover all protected characteristics, provide multiple reporting channels, prohibit retaliation, describe the investigation process, and state that violations will result in disciplinary action up to termination.

Prevention strategies include regular training for all employees and managers, clear reporting mechanisms, prompt and thorough investigation of complaints, consistent enforcement of anti-harassment policies, and leadership commitment to a respectful workplace culture.

Employers are automatically liable for supervisor harassment resulting in tangible employment action. For hostile environment harassment, employers can raise the Faragher-Ellerth affirmative defense by showing they maintained reasonable prevention and correction measures and the employee failed to use them.

Senior executive complaints require special handling—typically involving outside investigators to ensure independence, board or audit committee oversight, enhanced confidentiality protocols, and careful consideration of interim measures to protect the complainant and the investigation process.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message