ITC Patent Proceedings

Home / Practices / ITC Patent Proceedings
All practices
Intellectual Property and TechnologyPatent

ITC patent proceedings under Section 337 offer fast, powerful relief against infringing imports, and we represent complainants seeking exclusion orders and respondents defending against investigations before the International Trade Commission.

The International Trade Commission is one of the sharpest tools for stopping infringing imports, because it can block products at the border rather than just award money. We represent complainants pursuing exclusion orders and respondents defending Section 337 investigations, and the compressed schedule rewards teams that understand the technology from day one. Our engineering background lets us get into the accused products and the asserted patents fast, which matters when the whole case moves at ITC speed.

Proving Domestic Industry

ITC jurisdiction hinges on a domestic industry tied to the asserted patents. We help complainants establish it through evidence of U.S. manufacturing, research, engineering, or licensing activity, building the economic and technical record the Commission expects. On defense, we attack weak domestic industry showings head-on, since a failed showing can end the investigation regardless of the merits of infringement.

Exclusion Orders and Remedies

The ITC's signature remedy is the exclusion order, which bars infringing imports at the border and is enforced by U.S. Customs. We pursue general exclusion orders for broad coverage and limited exclusion orders aimed at specific respondents, and we address cease-and-desist orders for inventory already in the country. On defense, we contest the scope of proposed remedies and press public-interest and bonding arguments that can blunt their impact.

The Accelerated Timeline

Section 337 investigations move far faster than district court, typically reaching a final determination in twelve to eighteen months. That speed delivers relief quickly but demands heavy resourcing up front, with discovery and expert work compressed into a tight window. We staff and plan for that pace from the start so the schedule works for you instead of against you, whether you're seeking an order or defending against one.

Hearing, Commission Review, and Parallel Cases

ITC discovery is fast but thorough, culminating in an evidentiary hearing before an Administrative Law Judge that requires real preparation and clean advocacy. After the ALJ's initial determination, we argue legal, remedy, and public-interest issues on Commission review. Because ITC and district court actions often run in parallel, we coordinate strategy across both forums, using the ITC's leverage while managing how the cases interact, including any stay of the district court action.

Frequently asked questions

The ITC moves fast, with investigations usually resolved in 12-18 months, and its exclusion orders block infringing imports nationwide. That combination is especially effective when the infringer is a foreign manufacturer shipping into the U.S.

You have to establish a domestic industry, meaning significant U.S. investment tied to the asserted patents, through activities like research, manufacturing, or licensing. Without a qualifying domestic industry, the ITC is not available to you.

Exclusion orders that stop infringing products at the border and cease-and-desist orders against sales of imported goods already here. The ITC does not award money damages, but for a company fighting imports, an exclusion order can be worth more than damages would be.

Yes, and parallel proceedings are common. The ITC case moves faster, and a respondent can often get the district court action stayed while the ITC investigation runs, so the ITC result can shape the rest of the dispute.

It is compressed but still demanding. The schedule moves quickly and parties have to produce discovery on a fast clock, which means you need to commit serious resources early instead of pacing yourself the way you might in district court.

After the ITC issues a remedy, it goes through a review period during which the President, acting on policy grounds, can disapprove the order. It rarely happens, but it is a real step, so an order is not final until that window closes.

Our team

People in this practice

Document products

Related document products

Order attorney-drafted documents related to this practice.

Browse all products

Bring our itc patent proceedings team to your next matter.

Get in touch