Motions

Litigation | Procedure

We handle all types of litigation motions including motions to dismiss, summary judgment motions, preliminary injunctions, and other dispositive and non-dispositive motions.

Overview

Effective Motion Practice

Motions can resolve cases or shape their direction. MC Law's Motions practice handles all types of litigation motions.

Motions to Dismiss

Defective claims should be dismissed early. We file and defend motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b) for lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, and other grounds.

Summary Judgment Summary judgment can resolve cases before trial. We file and defend summary judgment motions, developing strong evidentiary records and persuasive legal arguments. Preliminary Relief Some matters require immediate attention. We pursue and defend preliminary injunctions, temporary restraining orders, and other interim relief. Discovery Motions Discovery disputes require court intervention. We file and defend motions to compel, protective orders, and sanctions motions. Case Management Case management motions shape proceedings. We file and respond to motions regarding scheduling, bifurcation, consolidation, and other case management issues. Oral Argument Argument can influence outcomes. We prepare for and present effective oral arguments on motions.

Frequently Asked Questions

A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b) challenges the complaint's legal sufficiency. Common grounds include lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient service, and failure to state a claim. It is typically the first substantive motion and can resolve cases before discovery.

Summary judgment under Rule 56 argues there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. It is filed after discovery and can resolve all or part of the case without trial, based on the evidentiary record.

A preliminary injunction is appropriate when the movant can show likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable harm without the injunction, that the balance of equities favors relief, and that the injunction serves the public interest. Timing is critical—delays can undermine the urgency argument.

Daubert motions challenge the admissibility of expert testimony under Rule 702, arguing that the expert's methodology is unreliable, the opinions are not based on sufficient facts, or the expert failed to apply reliable methods to the case facts. They are often case-dispositive.

Respond by demonstrating good faith compliance with obligations, addressing specific allegations of misconduct, showing lack of prejudice to the opposing party, and presenting any mitigating circumstances. If warranted, acknowledge errors, describe corrective measures, and argue for proportionate consequences.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message