Remedies

Arbitration | Substantive

We advise on remedies available in arbitration including damages, specific performance, declaratory relief, interest, costs, and equitable remedies.

Overview

Securing Appropriate Relief

The ultimate goal of arbitration is obtaining appropriate remedies. MC Law's Remedies practice develops strategies for securing favorable relief and defending against excessive claims.

Damages

Damages are the most common remedy. We develop damages theories, work with economic experts on quantification, and present compelling damages evidence. We address expectation damages, reliance damages, restitution, and other damages measures.

Interest Interest can significantly affect award value. We advocate for appropriate interest rates, compounding, and time periods. We address pre-award and post-award interest under applicable law. Specific Performance Sometimes monetary damages are inadequate. We pursue specific performance, injunctive relief, and other equitable remedies where available and appropriate. We address enforceability of non-monetary awards. Declaratory Relief Declarations may resolve disputes without monetary awards. We pursue declaratory relief to establish rights, confirm obligations, and resolve uncertainties. We address the binding effect of declaratory awards. Costs and Fees Cost awards can significantly affect overall outcomes. We advocate for favorable cost allocation and attorney fee awards. We present cost evidence effectively and develop arguments for cost shifting. Remedial Limitations Certain remedies may be unavailable. We address punitive damages limitations, caps on liability, and other remedial restrictions under applicable law and arbitration agreements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tribunals can award compensatory damages including lost profits, consequential damages, reliance damages, and restitution. The specific types available depend on the applicable law, the arbitration agreement, and the nature of the claim.

Yes, arbitrators generally have the power to order specific performance unless the applicable law or arbitration agreement restricts this remedy. However, enforcement of specific performance orders may require court assistance.

Common methods include discounted cash flow analysis, comparable transactions, book value, and market-based approaches. The method depends on the type of loss, available evidence, and applicable legal standards for causation and foreseeability.

Yes, tribunals routinely award pre-award and post-award interest. The rate, compounding method, and accrual period depend on the applicable law and tribunal discretion. Interest can substantially affect the total recovery in long-running disputes.

Moral damages compensate for non-pecuniary harm such as reputational damage and are available in many legal systems. Punitive damages aim to punish wrongdoing and are controversial in international arbitration, with most tribunals declining to award them absent clear authorization.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message