Retaliation

Home / Practices / Retaliation
All practices
Labor and EmploymentClaims

Retaliation defense for employers facing claims tied to protected activity such as discrimination complaints, whistleblowing, and leave requests, with practical advice on handling those situations so a later adverse action does not look like payback.

Retaliation has become one of the most frequently filed employment claims, often surviving even when the underlying complaint fails. We help you respond correctly when an employee engages in protected activity, and we defend the retaliation claims that follow under Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, the FMLA, and similar laws.

Breaking the Causal Chain

Retaliation cases turn on causation: did the protected activity cause the adverse action, or would it have happened anyway? We build a record of legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons, attack suspicious-timing arguments, and show that the decision-makers acted for business reasons. Cutting the causal link is the most direct path to defeating the claim.

Coaching Managers After a Complaint

The danger window opens the moment an employee complains, files for leave, or reports a concern. We coach managers on how to discipline, evaluate, and even terminate that person without creating the appearance of payback. Sound real-time guidance prevents the impulsive moves that generate most retaliation exposure in the first place.

Defending the Claim

When a retaliation claim is filed, we defend it from the agency charge through trial and appeal. We test whether the plaintiff actually engaged in protected activity, whether the decision-maker even knew about it, and whether the claimed harm rises to an adverse action under the governing standard.

Frequently asked questions

Retaliation is when an employer takes an adverse action against an employee because the employee engaged in protected activity, like filing a discrimination complaint, reporting a safety violation, taking part in an investigation, or using FMLA leave. The key is the connection between the protected activity and the adverse action. Even an otherwise justified decision can look like retaliation if the timing and context line up the wrong way.

It includes filing or supporting a discrimination charge, taking part in an investigation, opposing an unlawful practice, requesting an accommodation, reporting safety hazards, whistleblowing, filing a workers' compensation claim, and exercising a range of other statutory rights. The category is broad on purpose. If an employee is asserting a legal right or reporting suspected wrongdoing, treat it as protected.

It's not just firing. Any materially adverse action that would discourage a reasonable employee from speaking up can count, including demotion, a pay cut, an unfavorable transfer, being cut out of meetings, sudden extra scrutiny, or a bad reference. The test is whether the action would deter someone from engaging in protected activity, which sweeps in a lot more than termination.

Train managers to recognize what retaliation looks like and to steer clear of it, and document the legitimate business reason for every employment decision. Add a review step before taking action against anyone who has recently engaged in protected activity, and investigate retaliation complaints quickly. The point is to make sure, and be able to show, that the decision rested on real business reasons, not payback.

Retaliation is the most frequently filed charge with the EEOC. It rides on top of every other protected-activity category, has a broad definition of adverse action, and is relatively easy to prove through close timing between the protected activity and the action. It also arises naturally whenever an employer acts soon after an employee complains, which is exactly why the timing of decisions matters so much.

Our team

People in this practice

Document products

Related document products

Order attorney-drafted documents related to this practice.

Browse all products

Bring our retaliation team to your next matter.

Get in touch