SaaS Contracts

Intellectual Property and Technology | Information Technology

We negotiate cloud and SaaS agreements addressing service levels, data security, privacy compliance, business continuity, and other issues critical to cloud deployments.

Overview

Cloud-Based Software Delivery Creating New Commercial and Legal Frameworks

Software-as-a-Service has transformed how organizations consume software, shifting from perpetual licenses and on-premises deployment to subscription-based access to vendor-hosted applications. This delivery model creates distinct legal considerations that differ significantly from traditional software licensing. Counsel represents both SaaS providers structuring their offerings and enterprise customers procuring cloud-based solutions, bringing perspective from both sides to every engagement.

Subscription Terms and Pricing

SaaS economics differ fundamentally from perpetual licensing. Subscription terms establish duration, renewal mechanics, and termination rights that define the ongoing relationship. Pricing models may be based on users, transactions, data volume, feature tiers, or other metrics that must be clearly defined and measurable. True-up provisions address growth during the subscription term. Pricing protections may limit increases upon renewal. Discount structures and volume commitments affect total cost of ownership. Counsel negotiates commercial terms that align costs with value while providing appropriate flexibility.

Service Level Agreements

Because SaaS customers depend on vendor-operated services rather than controlling their own deployments, service levels are critical. SLAs establish availability commitments—typically expressed as uptime percentages—along with measurement methodology, exclusions, and remedies for failures. Performance standards may address response times, throughput, and other quality measures. Scheduled maintenance windows and emergency maintenance procedures must be defined. Service credits provide financial remedies for SLA failures, but customers should also consider termination rights for persistent performance problems. Effective SLAs provide meaningful commitments with real consequences for underperformance.

Data Rights and Portability

SaaS customers entrust critical data to vendor-operated systems, creating essential concerns about data rights and portability. Agreements should clearly establish that customers own their data, vendors have limited rights to use customer data only as necessary to provide services, customers can retrieve their data in usable formats during and at the end of the relationship, and vendors will return or destroy customer data upon termination. Data portability provisions should specify formats, timelines, and any assistance vendors will provide. Without clear data rights, customers may find themselves locked into relationships or unable to recover critical business information.

Security and Compliance

Vendor security practices directly affect customer data protection and regulatory compliance. Agreements should address security certifications and audit results, specific security controls and practices, breach notification obligations and timelines, customer audit rights or alternative assurance mechanisms, and compliance with specific regulations like HIPAA, PCI-DSS, or SOC 2. For regulated industries, vendor compliance capabilities may be determinative of whether a SaaS solution is viable. Security exhibits and compliance addenda should be reviewed carefully rather than accepted as boilerplate.

Integration and Customization

Enterprise SaaS deployments typically require integration with existing systems and customization to meet specific business requirements. Agreements should address API access and usage rights, custom development and configuration ownership, integration support and professional services, and ongoing compatibility as the SaaS platform evolves. Counsel helps ensure agreements accommodate technical requirements while clearly allocating responsibilities and ownership.

Business Continuity and Exit Rights

SaaS customers need assurance that critical applications will remain available and that they can exit relationships when necessary. Business continuity provisions may address vendor disaster recovery capabilities, data backup and recovery procedures, and escrow arrangements for source code access in extremis. Exit rights should permit termination for cause upon vendor breach, termination for convenience with appropriate notice, and transition assistance during wind-down periods. Clear exit provisions prevent customers from being trapped in unsatisfactory relationships.

Multi-Tenant Considerations

Most SaaS solutions operate on multi-tenant architectures where multiple customers share infrastructure and application instances. This model creates considerations including data segregation between tenants, impact of other tenants on performance and availability, customization limitations inherent in shared platforms, and update and upgrade timing that customers cannot control. Understanding multi-tenant implications helps customers evaluate whether SaaS solutions meet their requirements and negotiate appropriate protections.

Frequently Asked Questions

Requirements depend on business criticality. Mission-critical applications may need 99.99% uptime, while less critical services may accept 99.5%. We help clients determine appropriate requirements for each deployment.

Customers should always own their data. We ensure contracts clearly confirm ownership, restrict provider use, and provide for data return at termination. Never accept terms that compromise data ownership.

Data portability provisions require providers to export data in usable formats. Transition assistance obligations help with migration. Avoiding proprietary formats reduces lock-in risk.

Common certifications include SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and industry-specific certifications like HITRUST for healthcare. Required certifications depend on data sensitivity and regulatory requirements.

Contracts should address renewal pricing. Options include price caps, CPI adjustments, most-favored-customer provisions, or competitive benchmarking rights. Unlimited increase exposure creates budget risk.

Without protections, data could be tied up in bankruptcy proceedings. Contracts should address data return in insolvency scenarios, and escrow arrangements may provide additional protection for critical applications.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message