Trademarks

Intellectual Property and Technology | Trademark

Our Trademark practice helps clients build, protect, and enforce brand rights through strategic registration, portfolio management, licensing, and litigation.

Overview

Building and Protecting Brand Value

Trademarks are often a company's most valuable assets, embodying reputation, quality, and customer relationships. MC Law's Trademark practice helps clients build, protect, and leverage trademark portfolios that support brand strategy and business objectives.

Trademark Clearance and Registration

Effective trademark protection starts before adoption. We conduct comprehensive clearance searches, advise on adoption risks, and develop registration strategies.

Portfolio Management

Trademark portfolios require ongoing attention. We manage renewal deadlines, use declarations, and maintenance requirements.

Enforcement and Protection

Brand protection requires vigilance and action. We monitor for infringing use, send cease and desist letters, file oppositions and cancellation proceedings, and pursue litigation when necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions

Registration provides nationwide priority, presumption of validity, ability to sue in federal court, enhanced damages, customs recordation, and the ® symbol. Registration significantly strengthens protection.

USPTO examination typically takes 8-12 months. Oppositions or refusals extend the timeline. Intent-to-use applications require additional time after approval.

Distinctive marks are strongest—coined words, arbitrary terms applied to unrelated goods, or suggestive marks. Descriptive marks are weak; generic terms cannot function as trademarks.

Failure to police can weaken rights. However, enforcement should be strategic—focus on uses causing confusion or dilution. Not every minor use requires action.

Trademark rights are territorial. The Madrid Protocol simplifies international filing. We develop strategies based on business priorities and budget.

Coexistence agreements allow parties with similar marks to both operate within defined boundaries, specifying territories, product categories, or other limitations to minimize confusion.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message