Trial and Post-Trial

Litigation | Trial

Our trial lawyers have first-chair experience in jury and bench trials and handle all post-trial matters including post-verdict motions and judgment enforcement.

Overview

Winning at Trial

Most cases settle, but those that don't are won by lawyers who can try cases. MC Law's trial lawyers have first-chair experience across the country.

Trial Preparation

Thorough preparation enables trial success. We develop trial themes, prepare witnesses, and create demonstratives.

Jury Trials We try cases to juries with compelling opening statements and closing arguments. Bench Trials Bench trials require different skills. We present evidence and argument tailored to judicial decision-makers. Expert Witnesses Experts often determine trial outcomes. We prepare experts and cross-examine opposing experts effectively. Post-Trial Motions We file and defend post-trial motions including motions for judgment as a matter of law and new trial. Judgment Enforcement Judgments must be collected. We pursue judgment enforcement through all available mechanisms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Trial preparation includes finalizing trial themes, preparing witnesses through practice examinations, creating demonstrative exhibits, drafting jury instructions and verdict forms, preparing motions in limine, organizing trial notebooks, and conducting mock exercises to test case presentation.

A trial proceeds through jury selection, opening statements, the plaintiff's case-in-chief, the defendant's case, possible rebuttal, closing arguments, jury instructions, deliberation, and verdict. Bench trials omit jury-specific phases but follow a similar evidentiary presentation structure.

Post-trial motions include renewed judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b), new trial under Rule 59 based on errors or against the weight of evidence, and remittitur or additur to adjust damages. These motions preserve issues for appeal and provide the trial court an opportunity to correct errors.

Now called judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(a), it is granted when the evidence permits only one reasonable conclusion. It can be sought after the opposing party has been fully heard and must be renewed post-trial under Rule 50(b) to preserve the issue for appeal.

Damages are typically determined by the jury based on evidence presented, expert testimony, and jury instructions on applicable legal standards. Judges may modify awards through remittitur or additur, and post-trial motions can challenge the sufficiency of the damages evidence.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message