District Court Patent Litigation

Intellectual Property and Technology | Patent Litigation

We handle patent infringement litigation in federal district courts nationwide, from case assessment through trial and appeal.

Overview

Winning Patent Cases in Federal Court

Federal district court is the primary forum for patent infringement litigation. Our District Court Patent Litigation practice represents clients in patent disputes across the country, combining technical expertise with trial experience to achieve favorable outcomes.

Venue Strategy

Venue choice significantly affects patent litigation. We evaluate potential forums considering judge experience, local rules, timing, jury pools, and procedural practices. We pursue favorable venue when asserting claims and challenge improper venue when defending.

Case Development

Effective litigation requires thorough preparation. We analyze patents and accused products, develop infringement and invalidity theories, identify key documents and witnesses, and build case strategy. Early case assessment informs strategic decisions about litigation approach.

Claim Construction

The Markman hearing where courts interpret patent claims often determines case outcome. We develop claim construction positions supported by intrinsic evidence and technical analysis. We present persuasive arguments at Markman hearings that frame favorable claim scope.

Discovery Management

Patent cases involve extensive discovery. We manage document production efficiently, take and defend depositions of fact and expert witnesses, and prepare technical evidence for presentation. We control discovery costs while building strong evidentiary records.

Expert Testimony

Technical and economic experts are crucial in patent cases. We work with leading experts to develop infringement, validity, and damages opinions. We prepare experts for effective testimony and challenge opposing experts through Daubert motions.

Trial Presentation

Our trial lawyers have first-chair experience in patent trials nationwide. We present complex technical concepts clearly to judges and juries. We develop compelling narratives that support client positions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Federal district court cases typically take 2-3 years to trial. Timing varies significantly by venue and case complexity.

Delaware, Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, and Northern District of California see heavy patent dockets. Venue affects timing and practice.

The court's interpretation of patent claim terms at a Markman hearing. Claim construction often determines case outcome.

Reasonable royalty (minimum), lost profits if provable, and up to 3x enhancement for willful infringement. Injunctions are available.

Non-infringement, invalidity based on prior art or other grounds, inequitable conduct, and exhaustion. Defense strategy depends on facts.

Patent litigation is expensive. Early case assessment evaluates settlement economics considering costs, risks, and business impact.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message