Federal Circuit Appeals

Intellectual Property and Technology | Patent

We handle patent appeals at the Federal Circuit, protecting favorable outcomes and challenging adverse decisions through skilled appellate advocacy.

Overview

Expert Appellate Advocacy in Patent Cases

The Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over patent appeals, making it uniquely important in patent law. Our Federal Circuit practice provides skilled appellate advocacy, handling appeals from district courts, the ITC, and the PTAB.

Appeal Strategy

Appeal strategy begins before appeal. We identify potential appellate issues during litigation, preserve arguments for appeal, and develop the record needed to support appellate positions. When appeals arise, we evaluate strengths and weaknesses to develop effective strategies.

Standards of Review

Different issues receive different review standards. Legal conclusions, including claim construction, are reviewed de novo. Factual findings receive deference—clear error for bench trials, substantial evidence for jury verdicts. We understand how standards of review affect appellate prospects.

Brief Writing

Persuasive briefs frame issues favorably and present arguments clearly. We identify the strongest arguments, present them in compelling form, and address weaknesses candidly. Effective briefs make the court's decision easier by showing why the correct outcome favors our client.

Oral Argument

Oral argument provides opportunity to address judges' concerns directly. We prepare thoroughly for argument, anticipate questions, and deliver focused presentations that reinforce key themes. Effective argument can influence close cases.

En Banc and Supreme Court

En banc review addresses important issues or corrects panel errors. We pursue en banc review when appropriate and oppose unwarranted en banc petitions. For issues of national importance, we handle certiorari petitions to the Supreme Court.

Amicus Practice

Important cases attract amicus participation. We file amicus briefs for industry associations and interested parties, shaping patent law development.

Frequently Asked Questions

Appeals from final district court judgments and ITC decisions are taken as of right. Interlocutory appeals require permission.

Legal conclusions including claim construction are reviewed de novo. Factual findings receive deference.

Typical appeals take 12-18 months from notice to decision. Expedited briefing is available in exceptional circumstances.

En banc is rarely granted—only for exceptional importance or circuit splits. Petitions should identify compelling reasons.

Certiorari is discretionary and rarely granted. The Court takes patent cases involving significant legal questions.

Argument is granted in most significant cases. Effective argument addresses judges' concerns and can influence close cases.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message