ITC Patent Proceedings

Intellectual Property and Technology | Patent

We represent complainants and respondents before the International Trade Commission in Section 337 patent investigations.

Overview

Protecting Innovation Through ITC Actions

The International Trade Commission provides a powerful forum for addressing patent infringement by imported products. Our ITC practice represents both complainants seeking exclusion orders and respondents defending against Section 337 investigations.

Domestic Industry Requirement

ITC jurisdiction requires showing a domestic industry relating to the patents. We help complainants establish domestic industry through evidence of manufacturing, research, licensing, or other qualifying activities in the United States. We challenge inadequate domestic industry showings when defending.

Exclusion Orders

The ITC can issue exclusion orders barring infringing imports from entering the United States. We pursue general exclusion orders providing broad protection and limited exclusion orders targeting specific parties. These orders are enforced by U.S. Customs.

Accelerated Timeline

ITC investigations proceed faster than district court litigation, typically 12-18 months to a final determination. This accelerated schedule provides faster relief but requires significant resources early in the case.

Discovery and Hearing

ITC discovery is compressed but comprehensive. We manage intensive discovery schedules, prepare witnesses, and develop expert testimony. Evidentiary hearings before Administrative Law Judges require thorough preparation and effective advocacy.

Commission Review

ALJ initial determinations are subject to Commission review. We advocate before the full Commission on legal and policy issues. We address remedy, bonding, and public interest considerations.

Coordination with District Court

ITC and district court proceedings often proceed in parallel. We coordinate strategy across forums, leveraging ITC proceedings for overall advantage while managing interactions between cases.

Frequently Asked Questions

Faster timeline (12-18 months), powerful exclusion order remedies, nationwide effect, and particular effectiveness against foreign manufacturers.

Complainants must show a domestic industry—significant U.S. investment in research, manufacturing, licensing, or other qualifying activities related to the patents.

Exclusion orders blocking infringing imports and cease-and-desist orders. No damages, but exclusion orders can be extremely valuable commercially.

Yes, parallel proceedings are common. The ITC case moves faster and may influence or stay the district court case.

Discovery is compressed but comprehensive. Parties must produce discovery rapidly. This requires significant upfront resources.

ITC decisions are subject to Presidential review for policy considerations. While rare, the President can disapprove orders.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message