Patent Litigation

Intellectual Property and Technology | Patent

Our Patent Litigation practice represents clients in high-stakes patent disputes in federal courts, the ITC, and PTAB proceedings, with deep experience across technology sectors and a proven track record of success.

Overview

Prevailing in High-Stakes Patent Disputes

Patent litigation involves high stakes, technical complexity, and procedural sophistication. MC Law's Patent Litigation practice represents clients in patent disputes across all forums and technology areas, bringing a track record of success in trials, appeals, and administrative proceedings.

District Court Litigation

We handle patent infringement cases in federal district courts nationwide. We have particular experience in active patent jurisdictions including the Eastern District of Texas, District of Delaware, Northern District of California, and Western District of Texas.

ITC Proceedings

The International Trade Commission offers accelerated relief against infringing imports. We represent complainants seeking exclusion orders and respondents defending against Section 337 investigations.

PTAB Proceedings

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board provides efficient patent validity challenges. We file and defend inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and covered business method reviews.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common venues include Delaware, the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, and Northern California. Venue choice significantly affects timing, procedures, and outcomes.

The court's interpretation of patent claim terms, typically determined at a Markman hearing. Claim construction often determines case outcome.

Damages include reasonable royalty (minimum), lost profits if provable, and up to 3x enhancement for willful infringement. Permanent injunctions are available but not automatic.

Inter partes review challenges patent validity based on prior art. It's faster and cheaper than district court but limited to certain invalidity grounds.

Federal district court cases typically take 2-3 years to trial. Timing varies significantly by venue and complexity.

Patent litigation is expensive. Early case assessment should evaluate settlement economics considering litigation costs, risks, and business impact.

Fair use is a defense that permits limited use of copyrighted material without permission. Courts consider four factors: the purpose and character of use (commercial vs. educational, transformative vs. copying), the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market. Fair use is highly fact-specific.

For works created today by individual authors, copyright lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. Works made for hire and anonymous/pseudonymous works are protected for 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation, whichever is shorter. Older works may have different terms.

Yes, software code is protected by copyright as a literary work. Both source code and object code can be registered. However, copyright protects the expression of ideas, not the underlying functionality—patent protection may be more appropriate for novel methods and processes implemented in software.

Our virtual legal services offer streamlined, cost-effective solutions for common copyright needs. Services like copyright registration, assignment agreements, and DMCA takedowns are available online with fixed, transparent pricing. You get the quality of a top IP firm with the convenience of digital delivery.

Related Matters

StreamCo v. ContentPirate Networks

Represented streaming platform in landmark DMCA safe harbor case. Successfully defended client's safe harbor status while obtaining injunctive relief against repeat infringers, resulting in dismissal of $500M damages claim.

Venue: C.D. Cal.Result: Favorable Settlement
PhotoArt LLC v. Social Media Giant

Prosecuted copyright infringement claims on behalf of professional photographers whose work was used without authorization. Secured significant damages award and implementation of improved licensing procedures.

Venue: S.D.N.Y.Result: $2.4M Judgment
GameDev Studios v. CopyCat Apps

Enforced copyright and trade dress rights in mobile game against clone applications. Obtained preliminary injunction and permanent removal of infringing apps from major app stores worldwide.

Venue: N.D. Cal.Result: Preliminary Injunction
MusicPublisher Inc. v. AI Training Corp

Cutting-edge case addressing use of copyrighted music in AI training datasets. Negotiated comprehensive licensing framework that allows continued AI development while protecting rightsholders' interests.

Venue: D. Del.Result: Licensing Agreement
SoftwareCo v. Former CTO

Prosecuted claims against former executive who copied proprietary source code to competitor. Established ownership under work-for-hire doctrine and obtained injunction plus damages for willful infringement.

Venue: E.D. Tex.Result: Summary Judgment
University Press v. Document Sharing Site

Represented academic publisher in enforcement action against site hosting pirated textbooks. Implemented systematic takedown program and pursued contributory infringement claims against operators.

Venue: D. Mass.Result: Default Judgment

Get in Touch

Connect with our copyright team to discuss your matter

Send Us a Message